Vocenoctum
First Post
tonym said:Tensen, you seem like a nice guy, but you don't seem to understand something. When a guy is late paying a freelancer--especially more than a month late--the freelancer is totally justified in thinking the guy is a deadbeat.
<snip>
If any publisher is so late paying a freelancer that the freelancer wants to negotiate a lower rate, I suggest the publisher pay the guy in full, immediately. The freelancer thinks you are a deadbeat and will look for opportunities to tell other freelancers about your behavior. For years!
I think both sides have presented basically the same story from their sides. The publisher was trying to get stuff published and was new and made mistakes. The product didn't do as well as expected. The writer didn't have a contract, didn't know it was going to publishing, and after trying to get money, finally settled for less. The publisher probably paid the lesser amount both to get the writer gone, and also because he thought the material was worth less than originally discussed.
It was a bad deal, the publisher admits it. The only thing I can say about the situation from an outside source is that the writer is acting like it just happened, painting the publisher as if this is common behavior and demonizing him as a thief, rather than understanding that perhaps the publisher wasn't experienced in the matter.
It seems like a simple misunderstanding and a bad business deal, the only malisciousness IMO is the name calling and attacking.