lukelightning said:I'd say that if an illusion has no audible component then you don't "see" it with blindsense or blindsight. If the illusion does (e.g. minor image or major image you sense it and may be fooled by it.
zlorf said:Im refering to the magic item "Blindfold of True Darkness"
Wearer gains blightsight (MM306) ability out to 30ft and your immune to gaze attacks
eg an illusionary wall
Does echolocation detect that no wall exists?
Cheers
Z
Mistwell said:"A glamer spell changes a subject’s sensory qualities, making it look, feel, taste, smell, or sound like something else, or even seem to disappear."
It's obvious that sight is not the only factor with glamers. A blindfold will not make you see immune to glamers in my opinion.
I also don't think the prerequisite to make the item is necessarily indicative of the items effect.
zlorf said:Hi, my thoughts initially, but your not actually seeing anything when using Blindsight.
I found one monster in the MM which says that Blindsight (ex) makes it invulnerable to gaze attacks, visual effects of spells such as illusions and other attack forms that rely on sight. And that is the Yrthak (p262MM). Hard to argue against.
The Blindfold of True Darkness seems to say that you get the best of all the Blindsight abilities and use which one you want. Where monsters may be limit on how they use there Blindsight. Though i could be reading to much into. Overall is a very powerful item for its cost, apart from not seeing polymorph or alterself its as good as True Seeing.
Cheers
Z
Moon-Lancer said:the counter balance is that you loose your base sight meaning 30 is the maximum you see, ever.
one may beable to argue that archers 35 feet way make you flatt footed to their attack.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.