Well since the bear was a druid it was also consenting and anyway there is speak with animals, so you can ask.Between contenting sentient adults is one thing.
But with a bear?
Well since the bear was a druid it was also consenting and anyway there is speak with animals, so you can ask.Between contenting sentient adults is one thing.
But with a bear?
The bear in question is a wildshaped druid.Between contenting sentient adults is one thing.
But with a bear?
The bear in question is a wildshaped druid.
For the audience, there aren't consenting adult elves or tieflings or dragonborn either. And "healthy" is somewhat subjective.Okay, that's a bit better. We can give them the technicality.
But given that, for the audience there is no such thing as a consenting adult of that form, I find it hard to take it as a mature depiction of healthy sexuality.
Everyone who wants to play D&D. That's a pretty diverse group with diverse interests, preferences, and tolerances.Who the hell is D&D for?
Yes. And...?Because the movie, the computer game, and TTRPG seem to be aimed at different audiences.
For their own products, yes. For related products by other companies or for home games, enforcing a tone or maturity level would be pretty intrusive. Not that I expect Hasbro wouldn't necessarily try something like that (we've certainly seen it from other IP licenses) if they thought they could or it was worth it. But, at this point, they don't and the open licensing prevents them from doing so for anything using it. We'll see if that changes, but I guarantee, as a whole, we'll be poorer for it if they do.Don't they have some sort of IP manager who figures out what kidn of tone a D&D product should have?
Well since the bear was a druid it was also consenting and anyway there is speak with animals, so you can ask.
For the audience, there aren't consenting adult elves or tieflings or dragonborn either. And "healthy" is somewhat subjective.