Norfleet
First Post
So? In reality, we're at the top of the food chain, and we use weapons.Leopold said:no chance in hell would i disgrace my dragons with petty stuff like that. Rings? Amulets? Bracers? You bet. Armor and weapons? You got to be kidding, he would be laughed at all the way to the back of his cave where he would be slaughtered like the fool he was.
sorry, these guys are at the top of the food chain, they don't need petty things like that to keep their house safe, they've got all the natural tools they need at hand.
The real reason why a dragon would not use armor is because armor is exceedingly heavy, and a dragon loaded down with so much excess ironmongery would be incapable of liftoff. Flight represents a more potent defense for a dragon than armor plate, a design methodology also seen in the construction of modern (and not-so-modern) airplanes. Nobody really puts armor on a plane, because anything that would be thick, heavy, and strong enough to qualify as genuine armor capable of competing with the armor of ground-based vehicles would render the plane incapable of flight. Even the armor on helicopters, which fly in a more brute-force manner than planes, is nowhere close to the level of armor found on a tank, and is more intended for protection from light ground fire than it is for protection from other helicopters.
Weapons, on the other hand, a dragon would most certainly make use of. However, the technological base that a dragon typically operates in generally precludes the use of a JDAM, so the amount of weaponry developed for use in flight is relatively limited, and what the dragon already has is probably better than anything else which has been invented.
This is the real reason why you don't see dragons wielding weapons: Because few, if any, weapons which exist in the D&D universe can compete with what the dragon already has, without adding so much mass that the dragon is no longer capable of flight.