DRAGON MAGAZINE: What would you do?

Wow. Am I the only person who likes Silicon Sorcery?

Personally, I'd like to see Silicon Sorcery(in fact, focus in a bit more on certain games. I'd love to see more stuff for Gauntlet.:) :) :) I'm Such a dungeon crawler.)

I love the comics. Especially Nodwick. Phil and Dixie annoys me sometimes, but it's only one page.

MORE DRAGONMIRTH!

I like reading through the letters. It just has a different feel from the message boards and the internet.

I'd like to see more Campaign Components, those are mega-useful. And how about a couple of Middle-Earth articles? No better time to do em than when the movies are being released.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Dragongirl said:
That sounds good, but how would they decide which article is notebook worthy? FR Fans might like to have all those articles on a specific site removable. Monster fans might like all the monster articles removable, etc. I think it would be difficult to just choose one, and personally I don't want the whole magazine to be put together with liquid rubber. :)

And niehter would I. Although I have to admit that the idea sounds rather funny... Might make for a cool April Fool's issue. ;)

But, I would give priority to multi-issue articles: so if I do an article on London (for example) and want to cover it over four eras over four issues, this would take precidence.

If I do a series of articles on making better monsters, where each issue tackes a class of monster, then these would take precidence.

But it would be (for the most part) a judgement call.
 

KDLadage said:
But, I would give priority to multi-issue articles: B]

There I agree with you. If they wanted to do more in depth articles on something in multiple issues it could be very useful to have them removable so you could put the articles together. :)
 



Keep/Add

Campaign Components. These are great. Best Dragon idea ever. I'll leave it at that rather than gushing.

Ecology of X. Not as an every month thing, but perodically.

Class combos. Great idea. The early articles like this inspired me to do these for my character, who isn't a "pure" concept.

Alternate/added rules. I don't think I've seen anything like this since 3E was released. I thinking some of the very old Dragons that had rules for pain, weapons wear and tear, weather generation and so forth.

More focus on character/world development. The Wizards' Workshop section is nice, but it always feels like an appendix (maybe that's because I never read the fiction, silicon sorcery, and FR stuff). I guess a lot of this is actually taken care of in the Campaign Components, but I'd still like to see something of plausible geography, religion, or politics in a fantasy world.

I get the feeling that I'm in the minority, but I like to hear Gary Gygax spout off about the early days of D&D. I wouldn't cancel lose sleep if his columns were dropped, but they are far more interesting than anything in my "Drop" list.

Drop
Fiction. I never read it, so it's wasted page-count to me. Contrary to what I may have indicated elsewhere (heated discussion and all), I'm not completely opposed to having it in the magazine. I would be much happier, though, if it wasn't an every-month thing. Maybe include it the months that have Campaign Components (which I'd like to see every-other month). That way, the issue would probably appeal to both crunch-heavy and crunch-lite types. My favored solution, though, is to get rid of them.

Silicon Sorcery. Blech. I want this gone, yesteday. No uncertain terms and no real sympathy for those who like the column. Don't care about the games (okay, I do, but not when I'm in D&D mode). I really don't even see a correlation between NWN and tabletop D&D, unless you're doing an article on running a DMed, group game in NWN.

Speaking of NWN, I'm sick of the imports from the game. The ones I've seen aren't particularly inspired. Just say "No." Don't give me _any_ imports from NWN. Oops, too late, how about "no more"?

Change the artwork. Okay, this is universal for me in 3E, but Dragon covers are the worst. I have yet to see one that I like since the change in format. Stop making them look like PC Gamer. The old-style covers with full artwork and smaller lettering were _much_ more attractive. At the very least box the artwork in -- I hate reading in someone's armpit.
 
Last edited:

Dragongirl said:

There I agree with you. If they wanted to do more in depth articles on something in multiple issues it could be very useful to have them removable so you could put the articles together. :)

Good call. I'd love to see the Wizards' Workshop stuff be pull-out. _All_ of that would make nice binder-fodder.
 

Got to agree with getting rid of silicon sorcery, you know I guess I really shouldn't open my mouth on this one as I just realized that I have never read a silicon sorcery article, so I will change my statement to I wouldn't miss that section if it just disappeared.

Better fiction, it's hard for me to defend it when half of it's not that good and the other half is just ok. Good fiction that actually ties into the theme of that months magazine would be better.
 

KDLadage said:

[*] Center-set removable sections - Adventures that I can pull out of the magazine whole; articles on a given class of monsters designed to be removed and hole-punched for latter reference; things that are designed to be a part of a single, unified whole that I can pull from several issues and place together in a binder to use, as a unified whole.

I just have to say that I love this idea. Nothing else to add or contribute. It's just that it's a good idea, and I love it. I could go on :D
 

Publish under the OGL and make the text of every article 100% OGC.

But not just reprint OGC from 3rd-party sources but don't contribute any original OGC from the writers of Dragon. If it's in Dragon, and it's not an advertisement, I would make it OGC.

Suddenly, Dragon becomes a "must-have" for publishers again. These days, it's a "not-worth-the-paper-it's-printed-on-because-you-can't-use-the-ideas-anyway-and-in-fact-it's-probably-better-not-to-have-a-subscription-so-you-don't-pick-up-concepts-from-it-and-can-claim-parallel-development-on-concepts-you-write-and-publish-that-are-similar-to-stuff-in-Dragon."

--The Sigil
 

Remove ads

Top