Paladins must follow a code of conduct that is in line with lawfulness and goodness, not just goodness.
Does it really fill some vital niche? Is a fantasy setting somehow 'incomplete' without some of this?
Nor is a cleric required to worship a specific deity, but yet there's no 'empowered by faith alone' going on in Athas either. Changing the paly to a psion leads to even further deviation
Salammbo: The Eaters of Vile Things by Clifford Horowitz. I'm still not sure exactly what this is. It's a two-page article that states it is a fantasy game emphasizing problem solving over combat. Contains a new plague, a Ravenous template as well as sidebars for incorporating into your character or your campaign.
Certainly the elements don't just 'grant spells,' right? So simply by their faith in the power of these elemental forces, they get spells from them
By the same token, why argue against its inclusion?
The Tribal Protector: a warrior born with the ordained mission of protecting his Tribe and his people [snip for space]
These paladins are a secret society of holy warriors who've managed to tap into a source of divine power allowing them to use divine magic without swearing allegiance to a Dragon King.
The Liberators: another secret society working in shadows within the city-states of the Dragon-Kings, these masked warriors hold themselves to a code which gives great value to freedom as the right of every sentient being, and thus seek to undo the rule of slavery
They will risk their lives to save even a single slave from a cruel master's yoke, will perform extremly public acts of rebellious mockery against the rule or the Dragon-Kings, and damage the powerbase of the Templars through whatever means necessary. Then, once their mission of the day has been done, they retreat into the shadows, remove their disguises and escape Templar notice while they plan their next strike against the tyrants
reiella said:Interesting on the DK note, more proof that DK was a "Meta-plot" mechanics book, anycase.
This means that theoretically, another high level wizards/psion can use the Dark Lens during their metamorphosis and also be able to grant spells.
Mach2.5 said:Which begs the question, how did they come to possess the Dark Lens? Not a very easy thing to do since it was tossed into a molten lake that has likely solidified with the raging perpetual (and quite deadly) storm going on overhead.
Sorry, but even those who are generally in favor (as seen here, as well as almost 3 years worth of debate on the topic over at the WOTC boards) of including the paladin agree that its probably best if altered. I'm not really against the paladin in general as much as I am against the copy pasted core class version of it. I've already tinkered the holy liberator, consecrated harrier, church inquisitor (each with highly altered flavor text) renamed simply liberator, harrier, and inquisitor respectively (though I've only gotten around to using the inquisitor).
Kamikaze Midget said:I'm not sure where you're getting this 'immutable fact,' but even such, the proposed alterations are still quite lawful. It's just changed from a "respect authority" to a "when the revolution comes, don't allow it to be a chaotic morass...*organize* it."

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.