kreynolds said:
kreynolds said:Weeble. I just found another thread regarding this. Check it out. It's pretty interesting and might actually stand a chance at convincing me.
Weeble said:I don't see anyone here who agrees with you on MY point, nor any rules clarifying your point of view.
Weeble said:Christian-- "Making your own items costs you in two ways, don't forget. Aside from the experience points, there's also the feats you have to use on item creation feats instead of feats you could use during an adventure. Still, especially for Wizards, it's a very effective system."
Weeble said:This sums up what I've been saying and confirms all of the rules lawyering and citations I have listed.
Weeble said:I still am waiting for you to list pages and paragraphs in the DMG that backs up your point of view.
kreynolds said:First of all, learn to quote properly. It's easier too read.
Actually, that wasn't the part that I found interesting.
Oh no it doesn't. There is no rule in any of the books anywhere that says a magic item you make goes against your character wealth as the creation cost and not the full price. You haven't been lawyering squat. Everyone's been running on theory here.
Then you'll be waiting a long time, so don't hold your breath. I've scoured the books, and as far as I can tell, there aren't any that back up either of our arguments, and that's the problem. The closest thing I found was "Behind the Curtain: Magic Item Gold Piece Values" on page 243 of the DMG, first paragraph, second column, talking about different classes making wands. I'm sure you can find exactly what I'm referring to on your own. There is nothing in the books that solidly points at either view at all. The only chapters that you keep quoting regard PCs and NPCs created at higher than 1st level, which is a different matter.
Weeble said:And get some glasses if you can't read.
Geoff Watson said:I suppose you could consider the Item Creation feats allowing the character to exceed the 'recommended wealth' limits. It costs the character Feats and XP, so it's hardly 'something for nothing'.