Alright, Eric's post about what was in the upcoming issue of Dungeon prompted a mini-rant from me. Here's what I said:
And DarwinofMind responded with the other side of the coin.
So, what do you think? Should they be their own mags, are you happy to have them together, or do you just think that DarwinofMind and I should split the cost of a subscription and tear the magazine in half?
Well, it's definitely true that Dungeon is till the best value for the money, but I wish they'd take out poly and give me more useable content if they're gonna raise the price. People complain about Dragon being just a promo for next month's product, but at least Dragon's got D&D content. I'm not interested in d20 modern, nor Thunderball Ralley. LGJ at least has some useful info for D&D, polyhedron is absolutely unrelated to Dungeon's main purpose, which is to supply adventures and challenges. Not only that, it's not as if polyhedron even resembles the magazine it was under the RPGA.
Raise the price, replace the poly with another adventure, and you'll see a very happy, very loyal customer.
And DarwinofMind responded with the other side of the coin.
I have only ever in my life paid for 2 adventures. Sunless Citadel and Of Sound mind. Sunless Citadel becuase I needed something to run on 2 hours notice and Of Sound mind to support Kevin.
Never bought a issue of Dungeon and I never will, I have bought ever issue of Polyhedron since it was rolled into Dungeon and now I'm a subscriber, but I'm not buying Dungeon, I'm paying for Poly, Dungeon is just useless stuff tacked on.
So, what do you think? Should they be their own mags, are you happy to have them together, or do you just think that DarwinofMind and I should split the cost of a subscription and tear the magazine in half?
Last edited: