"I'm a member of the dominant group, and so I don't really think about how other people are treated or how my actions impact them," racism.
In this case, using actual academic texts of the time, and asking some players from the non-dominant group to take a look, feels like they did think about it and tried not to be naughty word. Exceeding the standards and expectations of the time doesn't redeem the work as being valuable for use today, but feels like it's a thing for judging the morality of the authors.
I wonder if any generation going back would find many folks who could withstand questioning on their views of the issues of the present. How many of us going back 20-30 years ago ourselves would give the right answers on the entire range of topics related to LGBTQ equality, privilege, policing, and cultural appropriation? In another 20-30 years how many of us right now will be judged down for not fighting hard for the environment (you actually traveled to cons by fossil fueled powered vehicles every year!?!?) or not defending the rights of some of the more intelligent non-human animals?
Last edited: