Dungeons & Dragons Releases New Unearthed Arcana Subclasses, Strongly Hinting at Dark Sun

It appears a Dark Sun campaign setting book is coming out in 2026.
1755804660144.png


Wizards of the Coast has released four new D&D subclasses for playtesting, all of which have heavy thematic ties to the post-apocalyptic Dark Sun setting. The four subclasses, released as "Apocalyptic Subclasses," include the Circle of Preservation Druid, the Gladiator Fighter, the Defiled Sorcerer, and the Sorcerer-King Patron Warlock. Although not stated outright, the Gladiator and Sorcerer-King Patron are explicit nods to the Dark Sun setting, set in a ruined world ruled by Sorcerer-Kings where gladiatorial fights were common.

The Circle of Preservation Druid creates areas of preserved land that grants buffs to those who stand upon it. The Gladiator adds secondary Weapon Mastery properties to their attacks, with bonus abilities. Notably, the Gladiator uses Charisma as its secondary stat. The Defiled Sorcerer can expend its hit dice to amp up damage to its attacks and can also steal the life of its targets to deal additional damage. The Sorcerer-King Patron gains a number of abilities tying into tyranny and oppression, with the ability to cast Command as a Bonus Action without expending a spell slot, causing targets to gain the Frightened Condition, and forcing those who attack them to re-roll successful attacks.

The survey for the subclasses goes live on August 28th.

 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer

The problem is that I can't tell you if that's something that AI hallucinated or pulled from a real thinking person and I don't have the time or will to research it. So I automatically assume anything pulled from AI is probably a hallucination (regardless if it's true or if I agree with it) until other non-ai source can prove it real.
That's the safe bet. These LLMs are highly advanced Mad Libs that have zero ability to reason or understand the material. So maybe it pulled together snippets that accurately reflect the source material, and maybe it threw together a bunch of made up bullcrap that it thinks will make the questioner happy. And the only way you can tell the difference is by doing a bunch of research to cross check it, which is honestly more work than just not using it in the first place.

Like, have you not seen the news stories of lawyers who tried to use ChatGPT to research their cases, and got hit with heavy sanctions when the brief is full of made up citations and fictitious decisions? There are use cases for AI, but they're all pretty specialized.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

The problem is that I can't tell you if that's something that AI hallucinated or pulled from a real thinking person
You do not have to do that, I do that already ;) It’s a definition for heroic, no better or worse than any dictionary. If I had written ‘according to Webster’s’ and put the same quote there, I doubt you would have bat an eyelash
 

Or is this just TSR making up the lore on the fly again, wildly contradicting themselves, and the novel people not working in conjunction with the game people?
The answer to that question is always, emphatically and unequivocally, Yes.

Which is why canon gatekeepong is so weird to me, it's not like wptC is any more loosey goose than TSR ever was.
 





Remove ads

Remove ads

Top