Lord Tirian said:Well, don't forget that being a gearhead is a designers' disease - they're always trying new things. And that's good - if playtest shows something as totally out of whack, they still have several iterations of the rule to use.
Cheers, LT.
ivocaliban said:Mongoose's Conan The Roleplaying Game 2nd Edtion (man, I feel sorry for those guys...releasing a revamped line of 3.5e Conan within weeks of the 4E announcement)
Scribble said:Does anyone ever get the feeling 4e was announced slightly earlier then planned?
First off, the whole I thought Wizards said they wouldn't be announcing anything until D&D Experience...
Then the fact that a lot of the stuff still seems like it needs a little work... Like Dragon and Dungeon, Gleemax... D&D Insider... All of it supposedly still "coming on line."
Plus, when I watched the announcement seminar, the whole thing seemed kind of rushed... But that could be because they used D&D geeks to announce it and not public speakers.![]()
(Psi)SeveredHead said:I'll probably like 4e, but I keep getting the feeling it isn't being playtested long enough. The WotC employees mention "we're trying this new thing now" in their blogs, but aren't they "locking up" the PH 4e so they can't make any significant changes now? It could be just a wrong impression.
I always got the impression that 3.0 and 3.5 were both rushed (the first to save DnD, the second due to market forces). I think 4e might be a bit rushed for the same reason as 3.5. However, I'm liking what I'm hearing about it.
3.5 was a relatively minor change, and still couldn't fix things like Mordenkainen's Disjunction. I wish someone at WotC would clarify the playtesting schedule a little bit. I may be worried about nothing.KingCrab said:A lot of bugs and flaws were found in 3.0 long before 3.5 came out, so the rushing of 3.5 wasn't too disasterous because many problems were well known.
I hope they don't need to, because I doubt they will achieve this.KingCrab said:A lot of bugs and flaws were found in 3.0 long before 3.5 came out, so the rushing of 3.5 wasn't too disasterous because many problems were well known. We know there will be no 4.5, so they really need to get this right on the first try.
KingCrab said:A lot of bugs and flaws were found in 3.0 long before 3.5 came out, so the rushing of 3.5 wasn't too disasterous because many problems were well known. We know there will be no 4.5, so they really need to get this right on the first try. I think it's a horrid idea to be releasing it so soon. I say, give the playtest groups some serious time to balance things out and delay the release of 4ed till it's going to be something really good.