MarkB
Legend
I'm building a character who has Elven Accuracy, and this will be the first time I've used it. I understand how it's supposed to work - if you have advantage on an attack based on one of the specified abilities, you roll the attack normally but can then re-roll one of the dice and take the replacement value as being one of your two d20 rolls for the attack.
My question is, isn't that mathematically equivalent to just rolling 3d20 and taking the highest result?
The ability has no per-rest limits, so there's never going to be a time when I say "okay, one of the dice was an 18, I'm definitely going to hit, so I'll hold off using Elven Accuracy on this attack so I have it available later." Nor, barring some meta-gamey circumstance where my character is charmed into attacking an ally and I want to turn a hit into a miss, will there ever be a good reason to choose to re-roll the higher of my two results rather than the lower. The only time I'd refrain from using it is if I've already rolled a natural 20 on the initial roll.
Is there something I've missed, or is it simpler and mathematically identical to just roll 3d20 for an Advantage attack in the first place?
My question is, isn't that mathematically equivalent to just rolling 3d20 and taking the highest result?
The ability has no per-rest limits, so there's never going to be a time when I say "okay, one of the dice was an 18, I'm definitely going to hit, so I'll hold off using Elven Accuracy on this attack so I have it available later." Nor, barring some meta-gamey circumstance where my character is charmed into attacking an ally and I want to turn a hit into a miss, will there ever be a good reason to choose to re-roll the higher of my two results rather than the lower. The only time I'd refrain from using it is if I've already rolled a natural 20 on the initial roll.
Is there something I've missed, or is it simpler and mathematically identical to just roll 3d20 for an Advantage attack in the first place?