Atom Again said:
Ummm, moderators...there are undoubtedly people in this group who are conservative and/or religious. Is it appropriate for someone to post a nasty comment like this?
I think I understood what he meant, and if you think about it, it isn't REALLY a statement against the religious and\or conservatives:
Conservatives, as we usually think of them TODAY, are people who like for government to move slow and change little, because rapid change usually means little thought went into the changes. And they like small government as a means of preservation of rights.
Given that, the "conservatism" that is being spoken of here is a twisting of proper conservative philosophy: Instead of slow, small, and steady, we had periods (the ones I believe were being referred to) when ANY change was seen as bad, even if a failure to allow change hurt people's rights.
In other words, I think the "conservatives" (read Luddites) that were referred to are, if anything, an embarrassment to proper conservatives because people wrongly lump them together.
Similarly, the religious bigotry referred to is FAR from being a function of the religion it comes out of. Instead, it was a corruption of the religion, perpetrated by mostly the same Luddite "conservatives" mentioned before, who feared change more than the possible eternal consequences of intentionally misinterpreting the doctrines of their own faiths. Far from insulting religion, anyone who would want to avoid that is DEFENDING religions.
I hope now
I haven't offended anyone. Um... (looks around at a random person who already posted).. they started it!
