Maybe instead of D&D 4e we'll be getting a D20 Modern 2.0 first.Vigilance said:That's too funny. Just a little more proof that the d20 Modern nonlethal damage rules are pretty badly written.
Eric Anondson said:Maybe instead of D&D 4e we'll be getting a D20 Modern 2.0 first.
I agree, but it has made me wonder we see so many "What will be in 4.0 D&D?" threads, and have for years, but almost never read anything about D20 modern needing a major revision... or even a modest reworking. Even Star Wars had a rapid revision after it's first publishing. Not even a Modern 1.5 yet... *shrug*Vigilance said:I dont think THAT is quite called for.
I think d20 Modern is a fine game and VERY well designed.
I just think that one small rule is bad.
deserves it's own thread.Eric Anondson said:I agree, but it has made me wonder we see so many "What will be in 4.0 D&D?" threads, and have for years, but almost never read anything about D20 modern needing a major revision... or even a modest reworking. Even Star Wars had a rapid revision after it's first publishing. Not even a Modern 1.5 yet... *shrug*
Interesting to consider...
Vigilance said:That's too funny. Just a little more proof that the d20 Modern nonlethal damage rules are pretty badly written.
Chuck
Keyword is "small." Not much to make such a big fuss since all you have to do is just implement D&D nonlethal damage.Vigilance said:I just think that one small rule is bad.
Oh, joy. As if D&D 4e is not enough for you rich money-crapping gamers. :\DarwinofMind said: