kingpaul said:Have you given PCGen a try? *ducks to hide for hijacking Vas' thread*
Kid Charlemagne said:OK, that I can understand. Certainly, this is no way to get rich!Or really do much more than keep you in beer money, for that matter.
If only PCGen wasn't as slow as frozen molasses...and could randomly generate NPCs.kingpaul said:Have you given PCGen a try? *ducks to hide for hijacking Vas' thread*![]()
kingpaul said:Have you given PCGen a try? *ducks to hide for hijacking Vas' thread*![]()
Anurien said:Out of interest, where were the 3400 copies of NPC Designer sold? ENWorld? Gaming convention?
Anurien said:Shameless, such behaviour is reprehensible![]()
Steel_Wind said:FWIW, we would never remove copy protection for any judge - for any reason.
I do think that the sheer number of products inundanting the judges makes evaluation of software difficult for them.
I expect that an easy to view product - 10 to 15 minute browse the pages - is pretty much where they are at for nominations. Actual awards - I expect it's a little more involved - but still. Can't tell me they are reading every single product like a copy editor.
The solution is to expand the judges pool with a separate group for software judging. It just takes a lot more time to review these sorts of products.
The ENnies are not only about external validation of one's work - they are well on their way to becoming what amounts to a significant commercial advantage. It's an Editor's Choice / People's Choice and Oscar for gaming all rolled into one. There really isn't anything else like it, so to just shrug it off is not required Vascant.
We have a commercial RPG accessory in development and I shudder to think what a ten minute view would do for it.
Vascant said:Just time to face the music, ENWorld really doesn't get the whole software side of this industry.