Kilmore
First Post

Okay. Just got my surprise of the day. I have to admit that it's not the "what" but the "who" that got me.
Well, here's what I think. First off, AV has the absolute right to do this as a writer in a free country and a gaming author under the OGL / D20 thing. The only thing I think would restrict him would be the conditions of his employment with WoTC, and apparently that's been resolved as well.
Am I surprised to see a book on D&D hanky-panky? Not in the least. I would expect that with the freedom of the D20 liscence, such a thing would HAVE to be done by somebody. Not for my personal benefit, but only because the opportunity is too wide open.
Perhaps AV is trying to expand the possibilities of the OGL by (please pardon me) stretching it's legs out a little bit.
Will we draw flack from those opposed to our hobby? I'll be surprised if we don't. Especially since it's the project of someone so closely associated with the cornerstone. I could see the critics right now: "See, those earlier books were the primers, now they're releasing their true agendas!" On the other hand, if it were released by someone not associated with the original publisher, it could be more easily explained as a fringe.
Personally, if I were AV, and I felt I needed to do this book, I would have done so under a flimsy pseudonym and without the official D&D stationery on the cover. This would have created a little firewall between the critics and the company, and also provided fodder for us for secretive whispering and giggling, enhancing notoriety.
But then, I don't have a business degree.
Will I buy this? I don't think so. My game isn't kid's stuff, to be honest, but I'm really not interested in running a "The Story of O" campaign. If that's someone else's game, enjoy. If there's useful information beyond that, I'll read the reviews.
I'd be especially interested in reading reviews by someone originally put off by the concept.
Last edited: