If you need that dragon to take a mile long breath against that minion army of Hobgoblins and do 500 HP of damage, then do it. Because in the end it has absolutely no relevance to the players. But if you want the Dragon to breath on the PC's then the breath will be X squares wide and do NdX + Y damage.
Once again because combat rules are designed for PC vs. Creature combat and not for Creature vs. Creature simulation.
And you don't find that even a little bit grating to the suspension of disbelief?
Yep. I own all 3.5. I owned all the 2nd edition books and most of the boxed sets before I moved on to 3E.
No more than sitting around a table rolling dice in order to represent the actions of my hero grates on my suspension of disbelief.
I think this is the biggest cause of your frustration and not so much the lack of new material. You can't enjoy gaming with friends that you have been hanging out with for 10+ years because of a new ruleset? I'm not very happy with 4E myself but a friend is running it and I am playing. Ultimately its spending time with friends thats really important and not so much the rules. I won't run 4E but that doesn't stop me from playing. Do you hang out with your friends outside of the game?I think one of my friends will stay with 3E or the new Pathfinder.
That is another thing. My group has moved to 4E. Most of them like it. I don't want to be a disruption to them since they don't like it. So I may have to find a new gaming group, something I haven't done for 10 years or more. It is going to be strange to see all my friends move onto the new edition while I try to get something going with the old one.
Not one bit. It makes no sense, to me, to go to an inordinate amount of work to represent the actions of Creature on Creature combat. The players don't care about it as it does not affect them one bit. So if the only reason to have it is to satisfy my sense of "simulation" I'd rather spend my time creating things that do matter and actually have consequence. So in the end, why bother?And you don't find that even a little bit grating to the suspension of disbelief?
I haven't played pure D&D in a while (I run A Conan D20 game once a month and a Call of Cthulhu BRP whenever I can) so perhaps I'm not in a position to argue for or against 4E.
But I still disliked most of the things I read about, so I'll likely stay far, far away...
Not one bit. It makes no sense, to me, to go to an inordinate amount of work to represent the actions of Creature on Creature combat. The players don't care about it as it does not affect them one bit. So if the only reason to have it is to satisfy my sense of "simulation" I'd rather spend my time creating things that do matter and actually have consequence. So in the end, why bother?
4e has been a huge blessing in that respect.