A jockey would have a strength of 10-12.
In 5e they can have any score the lineman can have.
A jockey would have a strength of 10-12.
We will have to wait to see. But I get that feeling tooI'm willing to bet that while technically possible, mixing and matching 1D&D and 5e character options is going to be more awkward than it's worth, so that by 2025 most tables will be using one or the other almost exclusively.
19. Critical hits are being nerfed, since you don't reroll and add all damage dice, but only the Weapon damage. No more sneak attacking rogues rolling buckets of d6s on a critical unless they word it carefully in the Rogue class description. It is also possible, now, to have a weapon damage that does... no damage dice. Net and blowguns, maybe? Were people using those routinely?
If they are committed to the coexistence of both phb, they will certainly allow to use both in AL and other official events. Will it be enough to encourage it too for private table? Quite less obvious. They will probably disallow to make character using both phb at the same time, avoiding a fiesta of shenanigans.I bet that for most tables it will be 2014 phb or 2024phb... I do wonder though, will there be 2014+tasha +motm tables that just do 1/2 upgrade?
So far, so good. They've already published OneD&D material for use with the 5E books without any issues.At least they are claiming to do so. Time will tell if they pull it off.
So we no longer have races, we have species . This has all sorts of implicationsThey made it quite clear in the video and the document that half-eaces are gone.
Anecdote versus anecdote. Hundreds are no more representative of millions than a dozen. But you know who does have data on what people actually do...the designers making this material.i'm not sure you can say for sure one way or the other on either of these... and I will take my 'not normative' experence with 100's of players over your 'normative' with a few friends
Welp...no book is entirely made up of Subclasses. So they could break all of the Subclasses and Xanathar's could still be technically used.I hope that's the case (since I want some pretty significant changes to some classes), but I remain curious how much they'll let themselves be constrained by a desire to be backwards compatible with subclasses in old books. We'll know a lot more once the class playtest docs start dropping. Agreed though that I don't expect there to be some massive outcry, most people I've talked to are broadly positive what we've seen so far.
But we are already mixing and matching them today.I'm willing to bet that while technically possible, mixing and matching 1D&D and 5e character options is going to be more awkward than it's worth, so that by 2025 most tables will be using one or the other almost exclusively.