NiTessine
Explorer
Umm... yes. Canon is the stuff that's in the books. It's official. Adjusting it in a home campaign is an entirely different thing, and does not require one to be a published author.JoeGKushner said:So you have to be a published author to change canon?
And I was actually referring to the fact that in Shelzar: City of Sins, there is an NPC named Bla'yne Nightfall, Sage of Shelzar.
True. My view is that when players start complaining about how the DM interprets a setting, it is time to change the players, not the setting. However, sometimes this may not be possible, perhaps due to a limited player pool, and a canon nazi on the wrong side of the DM screen can really make it difficult to run a good game.JoeGKushner said:I think it's great that Nightfall was able to help sell the SL setting so well to his players. It doesn't invalidate the question of would he quit it if confrontated about the "canon" aspect of it though.
I agree that it's bad form to question the DM in any setting but since many peopel claim that instead of X being a fantastic setting, that they went to it because it didn't have a lot of published work or an extnesive history, I'd like to know what happens when X does have more details or players know X better than the GM. Do they then switch to campaign Y?
People should switch campaign settings because a new campaign has something that interests them, not because players know more than they do.
Then, I have never really run into this problem, since I generally know my settings better than my regular players do. I pick the settings I run based on how interesting they are, not the amount of material that's been published for them.
So, how would you approach the issue?