glass
(he, him)
Wouldn't a "multiclass-only class" in 4e be also known as "a feat"?Not to mention the very first "multiclass only class".
glass.
Wouldn't a "multiclass-only class" in 4e be also known as "a feat"?Not to mention the very first "multiclass only class".
Well, more of a Feat chain, but pretty much yes.Wouldn't a "multiclass-only class" in 4e be also known as "a feat"?
That's a good point. Anyone actually getting the book for FR-use specifically? Not for porting genasi and swordmages to a house game or PoL setting, but actually for FR?Somewhat ironically enough, I think more people are picking it up for the non-FR stuff then they are for the actual FR stuff.
I hadn't heard about this. Do you have any more information?
That's a good point. Anyone actually getting the book for FR-use specifically? Not for porting genasi and swordmages to a house game or PoL setting, but actually for FR?
That's a good point. Anyone actually getting the book for FR-use specifically? Not for porting genasi and swordmages to a house game or PoL setting, but actually for FR?
That's a pretty cool idea. If I had done anything serious in FR in the past I'd try a similar storyline. I bet that's what WoTC's actually hoping players/dms will try to do.Mostly my group will get it for the classes.
However, we did have a massive campaign in 2e where a character or two became powerful wizards allied to the Harpers and BlackStaff. Got to epic sort of levels. Been thinking of having one of the players survive the spellplague. Lost his powers (maybe now a sword mage) but is seeking revenge Cult of Shar and Zhents (especially his old rival Fzoul). Certainly be a fun background. Also give a reason for some of the old players to know faulty realm info.
Yep, that's me---and I'm definitely interested.I think that it'll be pretty good for the non-FR player.
I suspect that a context tends to bring out the best flavour writing. The PHB's "D&D world" is IMO too much of a hollow shell for that - I got the sense reading about it that not even the writers thought they were writing about something believable...it seemed all too wishy-washy and handwavey for that.Why bother with the FR thing?