And he sounds like the most conceited blowhard, like he's ineffectual at life and has to excessively make up for it.
I don’t think namecalling makes anybody sound better.
And he sounds like the most conceited blowhard, like he's ineffectual at life and has to excessively make up for it.
Legalities aside, the PR campaign isn’t strong
Well, call a spade a spade, and a tool a toolI don’t think namecalling makes anybody sound better.
Notably, I am unable to find these sorts of arguments (merger of expression and ideas, for example) in Frylock's piece- you know, the kind that would make me take it more seriously. (Weirdly, a commenter even pointed this out to him)
I actually got into a bit of a heated argument with Dancey about this on Usenet, back when OGL first showed up, because he was pushing very aggressively the idea that WotC owned the use of the word "Strength" to refer to character stats, and that if someone simply made an adventure that referred to the D&D rules, that might potentially be infringement, and thus they should sign up to the OGL and get permission to use that material in exchange for agreeing not to use the Product Identity stuff.