Gamers who want to date gamers

Beladan said:
And the real irony is that she is most definately NOT a gamer. She had never MUSH'ed before and has never MUSH'ed since. Perhaps I soured her on the whole gaming experience! Play once and look what you wind up with :D

Blessing or Curse?:cool:

I would agree with those who argue that a shared interest gaming should not be either the sole criterion for finding a potential mate nor that non-gaming should disqualify a potential mate. But I don't get the sense that anyone is actually disagreeing with those views. Some of us just think that doing creative fun things with a mate or potential mate is better than not doing them.

Very true. I don't hold gaming to be any sort of criteria when looking for a SO, even though it is a significant part of my life. My planned approach is this: during the starting phases of the relationship, establish that you SO does not have a grudge about you gaming, and then move on to getting her into game if at all possible.

I myself put the person first and the hobbies secondary. But then again I haven't been an such a relationship yet so hey, what do I know?

However, there is also my little personal obastacle of being a complete and total coward when it comes to making moves on women.:rolleyes: I've engrained into my phsyche over the early stages of my hermit-like life the idea of "Try hard not to offend anyone. Just shut up and things will work out fine." While useful up through Junior High, this has since become a major obstacle when it comes to women, for obvious reasons.

It really sucks when you find the 'perfect' girl, and you try so hard not to offend her that you end up not being able to make an advance. She gets along fine with me and I'm crazy about her, but my "Making no advances removes the possibility that she will be offended." mindset prevents me from advancing any farther than that. Sucks to be me. The girl of my dreams is right in front of me, single, and my own psyche prevents me from doing anything. My mind is my own worst enemy. :rolleyes:

Enough self-pity, back to the topic at hand. :D If she were a gamer, I could invite her into the gaming group, she would get to know me better, and it would be THAT much easier to make a move. (besides the notion that the presence of a nice young lady would make the game a bit more mature and tone down the DM's crazy attitude) Hence, as a gamer I would have an easier time dating gamers than non-gamers.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Angcuru, I can relate 100%. For a very long time (27 years to be exact) I had the same problem...

I'm a perfectionist and have extremeley high standards for myself. So much so, that if I don't do something very well, I tend not to do it all. Simply approaching a woman I'm romanticly interested in was something I didn't do very well, so it was something I only did once in a blue moon. Ussually with bad results.

I didn't want to offend women or make them feel uncomfortable. And since my own self-standards are so unrealisticly high and I tend to do alot of self-criticism, rejection was something that hurt probably more then it probably should. So I just became very shy around women I was attracted to. The funny part is that I'm very confident in all other things. I'm socially savvy, fun to be around, etc... not the standard "geek" stereotype by any means.

Anyway, where I finally got a measure of confidence around women, was oddly (sadly?) in EverQuest. There were alot of women in the social circles I ran in and in that environment (for a multitude of reasons) I was able to shed away that paralyzing shyness. It was just a way for me to get a handle on things, to realize women't wouldn't be freaked out by me.

After that it became considerably easier and I dated quite a bit. I looked for people with similar interests to mine, so I joined the SCA and went to their social events. Not because I had an avid interest in medeival recration (though I did enjoy it), but because I knew people interested in fantasy/sci-fi/gaming, etc... would likely be there. I just wanted a geek-girl to share my life with :).

Well in the end, it all worked out :). I'm engaged to a wonderful woman who is a gamer and we are able to share alot of our interests. Oddly enough, she was one of the girls I met on EQ and we moved in together 2 1/2 years ago and it's been wonderful :).
 

Arravis, that sounds just like me, up until the Everquest part. Although I have a while ago determined that making a move would be easy in a 1on1 situation/conversation. I only ever see her at school, and there's always at least 10 people in any given room at all times. Hence, nothing even remotely resembling privacy. If I could talk to her alone, without other people constantly yelling, jumping around, ect., it'd be no problem. I've been slowly but surely shedding that awful, awful mindset of mine, and now it's overcrowded schools that are in my way. I will make a move, it's just a matter of time and place. *sigh* I can never win.:cool: Congrats to you on your engagement, though.:)
 
Last edited:


Neorxnawang said:

It is a fact that couples who share similar interests last much longer than couples who don't.

Actually, it isn't. It isn't even a fact that relationships based on attraction last longer than arranged marriages.

fusangite said:
Rather, what I worry about are gamers who find other gamers intrinsically less attractive. This suggests to me a considerable degree of self-hatred. It reminds me of the powerful writing of people like Malcolm X and Marcus Garvey about how the upsetting phenomenon of Black people finding people who share their physical features intrinsically unattractive. One really has to dislike oneself to find another's resemblance to oneself so off-putting.

But 99.99% of gamers are nothing like me. At all. I very rarely go to a FLGS because the people there are generally pretty weak. I don't dismiss their existence, but they aren't like me just because they too own a PHB.

The other .01% are the few friends I game with. If I go to the Sac gathering Tsunami's trying so hard to put together, it will be the first time I've ever gamed with anyone but these guys. I'm not really sure yet whether I'll do that. It might be cool to meet some ENWorlders in person, but the idea of gaming outsideof group doesn't really appeal.

Of my best friends, less than half are gamers. What we have in common goes far beyond a simple game.

I'm actually disturbed by the idea of wanting a gamer/sci-fi/fantasy geek etc. to share your life with. I fully expect that the right person will not conform to any expectations we form in our heads before we've even met them.
 

I like girls who are into gaming. I prefer a woman who would rather mess with my dice than mess with my head.

terror.jpg


:eek:

Now you just hold it right there , Mister!

Whoa now...

My man don't come NEAR my dice...

Uh-uhhh
Oh noooooo.

No. Sharing affection is one thing...but letting another human being touch your best D20....that's a whole other ballgame right there.... ;)

You gotta have your priorities, now...

I mean...Good Lord! Some things are sacred...

;)


Hey....just tryin' to lighten things up a bit, this threads getting a mighty cold vibe to it...

~S
 

Wayside said:




But 99.99% of gamers are nothing like me. At all. I very rarely go to a FLGS because the people there are generally pretty weak. I don't dismiss their existence, but they aren't like me just because they too own a PHB.

The other .01% are the few friends I game with. If I go to the Sac gathering Tsunami's trying so hard to put together, it will be the first time I've ever gamed with anyone but these guys. I'm not really sure yet whether I'll do that. It might be cool to meet some ENWorlders in person, but the idea of gaming outsideof group doesn't really appeal.

Of my best friends, less than half are gamers. What we have in common goes far beyond a simple game.

I'm actually disturbed by the idea of wanting a gamer/sci-fi/fantasy geek etc. to share your life with. I fully expect that the right person will not conform to any expectations we form in our heads before we've even met them.




I am 110% behind Wayside on this. He shares my sentiments exactly (and it is good to see someone does, I was beginning to wonder if I was in the right hobby).

Many gamers in my area are weak as well, many are social malcontents (I do have a couple of minor offenders in the group). I have dated a lot of great women and have never put any conditions to a relationship. Most of my friends are non-gamers, though most have at least given it a go. If I put conditions on any relationship, I would live in a very small world, instead, I prefer having many friends, doing various activities, and enjoying life. Maybe the distinction of geek=gamer is a false assumption, which I am beginning to see more and more.

I don't want to sound like an elitist within a fringe hobby, but many gamers I have met/gamed with are not the people I would normally hang out with. Many of the gamer stereotypes are not that far off, and I am not sure why that is, but that is life. I do have a few gamer friends that are also socially adept, we can game or go out and have a few beers, or hike, and I have a few gamer friends that have literally given women hives in their presence.

hellbender
 

I told myself I wouldn't post here but I guess I better tell you the down side of haveing a gameing spouse ( if you ever got that far). Sometimes a relationship doesn't work out be it dateing or marriage and the breakup is not only hard on those two persons involved but thier friends or in the case of gamers the group they game with. That happened with my Ex(Da Hobbit) and myself the hard felling, lies and child custidy issues wrecked havoc with the group and we all went our seperate ways. So be sure you want to share your hobby with your SO and make sure you don't marry or date someone crazier then yourself :).

That said ......
DWM 43 yo gamer fs iso single 25-35 white female in the southern US in driveing distance of central Arkansas. Just looking for a gamer chick with soft hands, a warm heart and a dirty mind.:)
 

You have to appreciate the humor in this...gamers, a largely socially inept breed, are debating what constitutes a good relationship! Comical!

Having read the other posts, I'd like to say this:

People with varied interests can indeed find that they compliment someone who does not share all of their interests. But, I find no reason to deride those who wish to find common ground.
If gaming is an important part of your life, find someone else who games! I find no reason to ridicule that. I'm not religious, but I find wisdom in seeking out others who share your religious belief. If you are a devout christian/muslim/bla bla bla, then find someone with similar interests. So, why would your hobby be any different? Above all else, your significant other should share at least SOME of your beliefs (I define "beliefs" rather broadly here).

I agree with Buttercup. If you have many similar interests, all the better! I can't imagine a relationship where I had very little in common with the other person, or wasn't willing to invest time in their interests.

I don't find that lack of common interests gives me something to talk about. I find that common interests, on the other hand, DO.
 

Wayside writes,

But 99.99% of gamers are nothing like me. At all. I very rarely go to a FLGS because the people there are generally pretty weak. I don't dismiss their existence, but they aren't like me just because they too own a PHB.

Maybe I move in different circles than you do but I think your opinion of other gamers is a little low. Are you really saying that for every socially successful gamer, there are ten thousand frothing geeks? My gaming friends are generally sexually active, socially successful people with good jobs who know how to host dinner parties and have large social networks that include people who are successful in business, politics and academic endeavours.

I would suggest that perhaps your problem is that you're confusing people who are gamers with people whose primary identity is their gaming. I would agree that people who primarily define themselves as gamers are more statistically likely to be socially dysfunctional but I have little contact with such people. Instead, I game with people are fun to game with because they have something to bring to gaming from the rest of their lives.

For instance, the friend with whom I game most frequently and I also are known for the parties we put on; every three months, we face the difficult prospect of narrowing down the guest list so that everyone can fit into my friend's house -- our parties are attended by prominent politicians, writers, academics, professionals and businesspeople. People travel for up to 6 hours by ferry to attend the parties we put on and in the summer, when the back patio is useable, we we often see 100 people turn up to our events.

Our gaming circle varies between about 12-20 people who are all socially high-functioning individuals; by your argument, there must be about 12,000-20,000 gamers in Greater Vancouver and they must all be frothing geeks who are nothing like us. I just don't believe that.

I very much agree with you that it would be strange for one's set of fellow gamers to be significantly different from an extension of one's circle of friends. But I've never felt the need to do that. I just don't see why you imagine that the gamers you don't know are so completely different from those you do know.

Of my best friends, less than half are gamers. What we have in common goes far beyond a simple game.

Same here.

I'm actually disturbed by the idea of wanting a gamer/sci-fi/fantasy geek etc. to share your life with. I fully expect that the right person will not conform to any expectations we form in our heads before we've even met them.

But surely, if you met someone attractive, you wouldn't immediately find them less attractive if you found they gamed? Would you?

Hellbender says,

Most of my friends are non-gamers, though most have at least given it a go. If I put conditions on any relationship, I would live in a very small world

Fortunately, hellbender, not one single poster to this thread has suggested that they would only date gamers. This imagined pre-condition to which various people are responding has been stated by no one and supported by no one.

Many gamers in my area are weak as well, many are social malcontents (I do have a couple of minor offenders in the group)....

I don't want to sound like an elitist within a fringe hobby, but many gamers I have met/gamed with are not the people I would normally hang out with. Many of the gamer stereotypes are not that far off, and I am not sure why that is, but that is life.

Well, I think it's time to make that logical leap from "90% of science fiction is crap" to "90% of everything is crap." (I'm sure given the subculture here that someone will chime in with the author of this quotation.) Most people I meet in school, at work and in politics are not people with whom I would want to spend my time. I'm sure if I actually attended gaming conventions, I'd hold the same opinion of the people who attended those. The fact is that most of us are sufficiently selective that we wouldn't want to date/be friends with 90% of the people we met cold anywhere.

I do have a few gamer friends that are also socially adept, we can game or go out and have a few beers, or hike, and I have a few gamer friends that have literally given women hives in their presence.

Well, again, I'm not sure there's any community based around organized social activities that won't produce such people. Political groups, churches and academic programs seem to possess such people in near-equal abundance.
 

Remove ads

Top