DH, thank you for really spelling out things clearly. As a new judge I am always concerned that I am doing the right thing. If I acted defensively its just the way I approaching things and I apologize to all in this discussion. I'll keep in mind your concerns when new proposals come up as I seem to be able to comment on most in this latest slew.
I do know that I have slightly different bias when it comes to proposals. Its not a person's position that gets preferrance in my head, its layout and consistency. If a proposal is clean, follows WotC layout standards, is clear and balanced I will give it priority first. That is not to say that I will disregard others. It is as you pointed out just easier to get off my plate before helping those that are not as technically written come to a completed format that I'd vote in. I like to spend the time to help out, but its just the way I work. I do it in my current position IRL too. This doesn't affect which proposals I'd vote yes on and those I'd try to veto. I try to remain as unbiased as I can when it comes to content. If it adds to the world I'd like to see it in. Point in fact, GW's Learner. I spent a lot of time with him while I was a player trying to make that fit and be balanced.