Jdvn1
Hanging in there. Better than the alternative.
It depends... if they're wealthy enough for an assasssin, they might get one, or they might start to attack the person outright--they had the chance to defend themselves, and they turned it down. If for some reason you lived long enough, turning down a duel labels you as a coward and you'd probably lose rank or be shunned.SlagMortar said:What would happen if the person committing the insult refused to duel? I genuinely don't know because I'm only passingly familiar with Dumas.
The situations get messy. Well, messier--there are always caveats and personal codes and personal opinions of how things should be done that varied sometimes a lot. Even characters in the genre admit to it duels and insults being messy/muddy/unclear situations.
If the refuser was of lower rank/status, he'd probably "disappear" one night and never show up again. Either he'd be killed or run out of the city. If the refuser was of higher rank/status, the challenger would constantly seek out the refuser and continually pester him for a duel, showing up as his door, stealing property, or kidnapping a family member until he settled for a duel in order to clear his name.
Though, duels didn't always end in death. They sometimes fought until one side either gave up, conceding to the other side (apologizing for the original act, or conceding the act was justified; either way, losing face), but that would incur bad blood and probably future duels; and sometimes they fought until one side was seriously maimed/disarmed/etc with much the same results. The intent is normally to kill the opponent, though, unless the duelers were previously friends.
It's a bit of a grey area, and I don't draw Dumas as my only source for the genre. He's probably the best known author, though.