crazypixie said:What if WotC, in a move similar to the CSG patent, attempts to patent the "online gaming community" format?
crazypixie said:Hypothetical what-if scenario.
What if WotC, in a move similar to the CSG patent, attempts to patent the "online gaming community" format?
Kaodi said:I think you underestimate the cohesion of this community. EN World has a lot of history and comraderie, which is something some new-fangled doohickey can't just up and replace.
Brown Jenkin said:Here is a long interview with Wizards of the Coast Vice President of Digital Games Randy Buehler on ICv2 about Gleemax.
http://www.icv2.com/articles/news/10687.html
Yeah, it's not like accessing one site kills the other site. Checking into a board takes what? Five minutes? If you're idly browsing for half an hour, you can probably get the gist of the most interesting threads on five or six messageboards.Steel_Wind said:I use ENWorld, RPG.net and BGG. If there is a sudden fourth choice of any quality - I'll use it too. But it won't be to the exclusion of the other three sites I already have used for some time.
The name is definitely setting new benchmarks for retarded marketing decisions.Rodrigo Istalindir said:Heh. Stupid name, and yet another doomed attempt to 'get down' with what the kids R doing these days. They'd be far better off working within the confines of MySpace than trying to create another on-line hangout.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.