ravenheart
Explorer
I'm doubtful, since there's no unreleased race mentioned in the Ardent article. And they mention all (?) known races that have a bonus to Charisma. But they might have gotten more careful with such tidbits...
Dak'kon was Githzerai, though. IIRC the only Githyanki were antagonistic.
Dak'kon sold both types of gith to me, since his racial creation myth / back-story encompassed both races.Dak'kon is the one who sold Githzerai as a PC race.
I'm in a similar boat.Actually, reading that, I realize I'm the exact same way. Which is probably why I don't react well to the various Gith classes, either. Hunh.
Heh, I wouldn't say no to the Worgen, if 4e decided it really wanted to start stealing from WoW.plus, next wow's (horde) race is goblin... but i'd rather have a new race.
I'm in a similar boat.
But also I came in at the tail end of 2e/beginning of 3e, so Planescape never registered on my radar. No planescape, no giving a damn about the Planes.
Yeah, same here. Except I came in at the start of 2e. Only played a few games of Planescape, and never really "got" it. I do vaguely remember playing a tiefling rogue who got caught up in an arms heist. But still don't care much for planar games.
The thing is, if they're going to bring in Goblins or Gnolls, why the rant about no Githyanki as a playable race? That just irks me, since Githyanki seem to fit a good niche (mechanically and flavor-wise), and seem to be rather popular.
So: if they won't give me Githyanki, then I'm against all the other monster races. Purely for reasons of spite.
Cheers, -- N
I'm going to be pissed if Dak'kon isn't used in the names of one of the Gith feats.2/ A certain Fighter/Magic-User from Planescape:Torment.