ColonelHardisson
What? Me Worry?
The Traveler said:...but in this case it's unsolicited advice. Read the first post. Psionicist said he was going with GURPS, and asked people to suggest GURPS supplements and settings to him. How is it your burden to convince him otherwise. He didn't ask if it could be better done in d20. He didn't ask for a debate on the comparative merits of either setting. That means, again, that to do so was a hijack.
Y'know, with the way flame wars can erupt at the drop of a hat, I think a civil discussion of a topic, whether it's on-topic or not, should be welcomed. Besides, there were suggestions given about the original topic - wouldn't a GURPS board be able to sustain a discussion of GURPS a bit longer and more vigorously than a D&D/d20 board? The original topic was very nebulous, which makes it tough to remain on-topic. I'm not saying to never try to discuss GURPS, or whatever game system, but you have to expect people here to begin discussing the main game the board was created to discuss, eventually. Call it a hijack if you want, but if a conversation evolves into something else from what it was originally, and remains civil, I think chastising folk for it is mean-spirited. I could see complaining if the discussion had devolved into spiteful argument, but it hasn't.
So, to address Psionicist's original question - try Atomic Horror, which SJG just re-released. I always liked 1950s horror films, and the milieu is fun and familiar. Or, try to find GURPS The Prisoner, based on the British TV show from the 60s. But, to play it properly you'd really have to watch the show.