• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

Harassment Policies: New Allegations Show More Work To Be Done

The specter of sexual harassment has once again risen up in tabletop gaming circles. Conventions are supposed to be places where gamers and geeks can be themselves and embrace their loves. Conventions need clear and well formulated harassment policies, and they need to enforce them. In this instance the allegations from multiple women have taken place at gaming conventions and gathering in different locations around the country. In one case, the harassment was took place over the course of years and spilled over into electronic formats.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The specter of sexual harassment has once again risen up in tabletop gaming circles. Conventions are supposed to be places where gamers and geeks can be themselves and embrace their loves. Conventions need clear and well formulated harassment policies, and they need to enforce them. In this instance the allegations from multiple women have taken place at gaming conventions and gathering in different locations around the country. In one case, the harassment was took place over the course of years and spilled over into electronic formats.


The alleged harasser in these cases was Sean Patrick Fannon, President of Evil Beagle Games, Brand Manager for Savage Rifts at Pinnacle Entertainment Group, as well as being a game designer and developer with a long history in the tabletop role-playing industry.

There is a long and untenable policy of harassment at conventions that stretches back to science fiction and fantasy fandom in the 1960s. Atlanta's Dragon*Con has been a lightning rod in the discussions about safety at geeky conventions after one of the convention's founders was arrested and pled guilty to three charges of molestation. We have also covered reports of harassment at conventions such as Paizo Con, and inappropriate or harassing behavior by notable industry figures. It is clear that clear harassment policies and firm enforcement of them is needed in spaces where members of our community gather, in order that attendees feel safe to go about their hobby. Some companies, such as Pelgrane Press, now refuse to attend conventions where a clear harassment policy is not available.

Several women have approached me to tell me about encounters with Fannon. Some of them asked not to be named, or to use their reports for background verification only. We also reached out to Sean Patrick Fannon for his comments, and he was willing to address the allegations.

The women that I spoke with had encounters with Fannon that went back to 2013 and 2014 but also happened as recently as the summer of 2017. Each of the locations were in different parts of the country, but all of them occurred when Fannon was a guest of the event.

The worse of the two incidents related to me happened at a convention in the Eastern part of the United States. In going back over texts and messages stretching back years the woman said that it "is frustrating [now] to read these things" because of the cajoling and almost bullying approach that Fannon would use in the messages. She said that Fannon approached her at the con suite of the convention, and after speaking with her for a bit and playing a game with a group in the suite he showed her explicit photos on his cellphone of him engaged in sex acts with a woman.

Fannon's ongoing harassment of this woman would occur both electronically and in person, when they would both be at the same event, and over the course of years he would continue to suggest that she should engage in sexual acts, either with him alone, or with another woman.

Fannon denies the nature of the event, saying "I will assert with confidence that at no time would such a sharing have occurred without my understanding explicit consent on the part of all parties. It may be that, somehow, a miscommunication or misunderstanding occurred; the chaos of a party or social gathering may have created a circumstance of all parties not understanding the same thing within such a discourse. Regardless, I would not have opened such a file and shared it without believing, sincerely, it was a welcome part of the discussion (and in pursuit of further, mutually-expressed intimate interest)."

The second woman, at a different gaming-related event in another part of the country, told of how Fannon, over the course of a day at the event, asked her on four different occasions for hugs, or physical contact with her. Each time she clearly said no to him. The first time she qualified her answer with a "I don't even know you," which prompted Fannon after he saw her for a second time to say "Well, you know me now." She said that because of the multiple attempts in a short period of time that Fannon's behavior felt predatory to her. Afterwards he also attempted to connect with her via Facebook.

Afterwards, this second woman contacted the group that organized the event to share what happened and they reached out to Fannon with their concerns towards his behavior. According to sources within the organization at the time, Fannon - as with the first example - described it to the organizers as a misunderstanding on the woman's part. When asked, he later clarified to us that the misunderstanding was on his own side, saying "Honestly, I should have gotten over myself right at the start, simply owned that I misunderstood, and apologized. In the end, that's what happened, and I walked away from that with a pretty profound sense of how to go forward with my thinking about the personal space of those I don't know or know only in passing."

Both women faced ongoing pressure from Fannon, with one woman the experiences going on for a number of years after the initial convention meeting. In both cases he attempted to continue contact via electronic means with varying degrees of success. A number of screen shots from electronic conversations with Fannon were shared with me by both women.

Diane Bulkeley was willing to come forward and speak on the record of her incidents with Fannon. Fannon made seemingly innocent, and yet inappropriate comments about her body and what he wanted to do with her. She is part of a charity organization that had Fannon as a guest. What happened to her was witnessed by another woman with whom I spoke about that weekend. As Bulkeley heard some things, and her witness others, their experiences are interwoven to describe what happened. Bulkeley described this first encounter at the hotel's elevators: "We were on the floor where our rooms were to go downstairs to the convention floor. I was wearing a tank top and shirt over it that showed my cleavage. He was staring at my chest and said how much he loved my shirt and that I should wear it more often as it makes him hot. For the record I can't help my cleavage is there." Bulkeley went on to describe her mental state towards this "Paying a lady a compliment is one thing, but when you make a direct comment about their chest we have a problem."

Later on in the same day, while unloading some boxes for the convention there was another incident with Fannon. Bulkeley described this: "Well, [the witness and her husband] had to move their stuff from a friends airplane hangar (we all use as storage for cars and stuff) to a storage until next to their house. Apparently Sean, while at the hanger, made grunt noises about my tank top (it was 80 outside) while Tammy was in the truck. I did not see it. But she told me about it. Then as we were unloading the truck at the new facility Sean kept looking down my shirt and saying I have a great view etc. Her husband said to him to knock it off. I rolled my eyes, gave him a glare and continued to work. I did go and put on my event day jacket (light weight jacket) to cover up a little."

The witness, who was in the truck with Fannon, said that he "kept leering down at Diane, glancing down her shirt and making suggestive sounds." The witness said that Fannon commented "'I'm liking the view from up here.'"

Bulkeley talked about how Fannon continued his behavior later on in a restaurant, having dinner with some of the guests of the event. Fannon made inappropriate comments about her body and embarrassed her in front of the other, making her feel uncomfortable throughout the dinner.

Bulkeley said that Fannon also at one point touched her hair without asking, and smelled it as well. "[Fannon] even would smell my long hair. He begged me to not cut it off at a charity function that was part of the weekend's event." She said that he also pressed his pelvis tightly against her body while hugging her. These incidents occurred at a convention during the summer of 2017.

Fannon denies these events. "The comments and actions attributed to me simply did not happen; I categorically and absolutely deny them in their entirety."

When asked for comment, and being informed that this story was being compiled Fannon commented "I do not recall any such circumstance in which the aftermath included a discourse whereby I was informed of distress, anger, or discomfort." He went on to say "The only time I recall having ever been counseled or otherwise spoken to about my behavior in such matters is the Gamers Giving/Total Escape Games situation discussed above. The leader of the organization at that time spoke to me specifically, asked me to be aware that it had been an issue, and requested I be aware of it in the future. It was then formally dropped, and that was the end of it until this time."

There were further reports; however, we have respected the wishes of those women who asked to remain anonymous for fear of online harassment. In researching this article, I talked to multiple women and other witnesses.

About future actions against the alleged behaviors he also said "It is easy, after all, to directly attack and excise obviously predatory and harassing behavior. It is much more difficult to point out and correct behavior that falls within more subtle presentations, and it's more difficult to get folks to see their actions as harmful when they had no intention to cause harm, based on their assumptions of what is and isn't appropriate. It's good for us to look at the core assumptions that lead to those behaviors and continue to challenge them. That's how real and lasting change within society is achieved."

Fannon's weekly column will no longer be running on E.N. World.

Have you suffered harassment at the hands of someone, industry insider or otherwise, at a gaming convention? If you would like to tell your story, you can reach out to me via social media about any alleged incidents. We can speak confidentially, but I will have to know the identity of anyone that I speak with.

This does open up the question of: At what point do conventions become responsible for the actions of their guest, when they are not more closely scrutinizing the backgrounds of those guests? One woman, who is a convention organizer, with whom I spoke for the background of this story told me that word gets around, in the world of comic conventions, when guests and creators cause problems. Apparently this is not yet the case in the world of tabletop role-playing game conventions, because there are a growing number of publishers and designers who have been outed for various types of harassing behavior, but are still being invited to be guest, and in some cases even guests of honor, at gaming conventions around the country. The message that this sends to women who game is pretty clear.

More conventions are rolling out harassment policies for guests and attendees of their conventions. Not only does this help to protect attendees from bad behavior, but it can also help to protect conventions from bad actors within the various communities that gather at our conventions. As incidents of physical and sexual harassment are becoming more visible, it becomes more and more clear that something needs to be done.

additional editorial contributions by Morrus
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Umbran

Mod Squad
Staff member
Supporter
Completely eliminating harassment from gaming is, I fear, not an achievable goal. There is no form of wrongdoing in the world that humans have ever been able to completely eliminate, and the community is too large to police with 100% efficacy. Minimize. Reduce significantly. Make our community safer than the world at large. These might be things we can attain.

But then, quibbling over the word "eliminate" is a kind of deflection and distraction. Aim high, and what we can achieve will at least be an improvement.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

G

Guest 6801328

Guest
Completely eliminating harassment from gaming is, I fear, not an achievable goal. There is no form of wrongdoing in the world that humans have ever been able to completely eliminate, and the community is too large to police with 100% efficacy. Minimize. Reduce significantly. Make our community safer than the world at large. These might be things we can attain.

But then, quibbling over the word "eliminate" is a kind of deflection and distraction. Aim high, and what we can achieve will at least be an improvement.

The impossibility of perfection is an objection often raised by those who are hoping nothing will be done at all.
 

Anselyn

Explorer
Who thinks this is too vague, such that attendees capable of reading the policy will somehow not be aware of what is and isn't acceptable?

I didn't know what "bathroom policing" was and so googled it. I agree that's harassment but it was stated as jargon (to me) rather than being entirely transparent in meaning from the words as the rest is.

I am also unaware of the difference between following and stalking - and haven't googled that, yet.

The statment clearly inidcates a sphere of definitions that would raise awareness with any reader - but those most needing to engage with such a policy are perhaps most likely to not know the subtleties of some definitions there.

I am also mindful that for any international gathering - such as ENWorldCon - any policy has to be clear for anyone reading it in their second language or, at least, for users of non-American English.
 



S

Sunseeker

Guest
We don't. Ultimately the standard of behaviour in public spaces in general has to improve if the issue of harassment and the general feeling of lack of safety is to be addressed. However, that is no reason no to demand better behaviour in the private spaces we do control.

If you want to move a mountain, you start by carrying away a single stone and all that.

And improvement in small places will carry out into the larger sphere. People who have to "step up" to attend a Con may find it less difficult than they imagined (it really is) and may find themselves stepping up elsewhere. Because really: noone wants to deal with harassment. Women don't want to be harassed, men don't want to be harassed, people don't want to hang out with harassers; so if we keep calling on people to step up we will see a ripple effect as people start preferring communities and events with less harassment, and then carry that drive for reduced harassment back to their home, their schools, and their other social places.

I mean, we're demanding social change here, at least within a microcosm of society, a sub-society if you will, and that kind of demand has always rippled out into the larger scene. Because it's fair to say: the application of social pressure to get people to turn away from bad behaviour has IMO, fallen to a pretty low point in society at large.
 

Jeanneliza

First Post
Yep. As my dad used to say, "Making perfect the enemy of good is dumb."

And to the others that mentioned no system would be perfect. I can't speak for others under all of those other labels that have changed over time, but I don't think most women are asking or expect perfection. A good many of us end up in relationships with men ya know. :)
 

Calithorne

Explorer
Parents should be teaching their sons how to behave themselves around women. I think the absence of fathers from many young men's lives is the biggest problem. A young man with a father will be cuffed on the head if he disrespects his mother or sisters.
 

Umbran

Mod Squad
Staff member
Supporter
This is great!

My main request for expansion would be in having more of it addressing the potential victims:

- clarifying how confidential reports are (or are not),

- being absolutely clear on who among the convention organizers decides what action is appropriate (ideally it should be a group and NOT an individual),

- whether and how someone filing a report are notified of the con's response, as well as

- whether there are appeal processes or not (for both accusers and accused who feel their concerns were not adequately addressed).

- Lastly, there is the massive can of worms of pre-emptive banning for behavior outside of the con is possible and under what circumstances. That's something cons should have a clear policy on before it comes up, because it will eventually come up especially as the backlog of unreported issues are finally reported because they are somewhat more likely to be take seriously now.

A couple of thoughts -

They do have to keep it short, or there might be credible defense of, "You actually expected people to read all this?" The primary goal of the document is to delineate acceptable behavior, which folks discussing here have noted is a bit of a sticking point.

I think there's good reasons to not list the details of internal processes in an outward facing document. The con should *have* policies, yes. The last couple I knew the internal workings of had several different policies and action-trees for various cases, and they'd be rather long if made attendee-facing. And they have to have some leeway to deal with things that aren't cut-and-dried. Making public the internal processes (say, of decision making) give offenders an invitation to argue ("You didn't follow your own policy!"). In the end, for this document, the fact that the convention reserves the right to boot you if it deems necessary, *however* it makes that decision, is the primary bit.

The last time I had to register a complaint (two years ago) the con made perfectly clear what the privacy/cofidentiality policies were and what results-reporting would be before I told them anything, so I could make informed choices of the information to include.

Appeals and pre-con banning are not really issues that are dealt with *at* the con, and so are a little out of the purview of this particular document.
 

Riley37

First Post
We need clear boundaries of what behavior is acceptable in the convention context, and enforcement of those boundaries. Not just to prevent agaisnt bad actors, but so that people who are acting in good faith have the information required to do so.

You have posted this in your community member role, rather than your Moderator role, if I understand correctly. Is this therefore fair game for dissent, disagrement, and debate? Is the thread open to counter-arguments, asserting that we don't need boundaries, and that we don't need enforcement?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Voidrunner's Codex

Related Articles

Remove ads

Voidrunner's Codex

Remove ads

Top