Have a 6th level PC and I just lvl'd

[MEG Hal]

We have a:
Pal1Cleric5 old guy
Pal5
Ftr6
Rogue6 (me)
We currently have no MU and with 26hp's I am still weak, so your thoughts?
Should I:
Take another lvl in Rog
Take a level in Ftr
Take a level in Sor
What do ya think?

Thanks

 

[Morpheus]

We have a:
Pal1Cleric5 old guy
Pal5
Ftr6
Rogue6 (me)
We currently have no MU and with 26hp's I am still weak, so your thoughts?
Should I:
Take another lvl in Rog
Take a level in Ftr
Take a level in Sor
What do ya think?

Thanks

Take a level in Court Jester with a specialization in Buffoonary. Wait...you already have...

 

[MEG Hal]

Take a level in Court Jester with a specialization in Buffoonary. Wait...you already have...

I would normally not take this from you, but since you DM this campaign I will let you slide----you rat bastard DM!

 

[JoeGKushner]

Go Rogue.

You mention sorcerer, but mention the low hit points you already have. Sorcer isn't goingto help you there.

You mention fighter which could be useful as it gives a bonus feat right away, better hit dice and attack bonus. Your skills will suffer though.

Nah, go rogue. You'll keep up with the high number of skill points and if you're aiming for any PrC, should basically be there for 95% of 'em.

 

[Castellan]

Go Rogue.

I have to agree... I've seen too many decisions to "branch out" turn into a disaster. Since multiclassed characters are, overall, weaker, you might not really help your group as much as you like. Stick with rogue.

 

[Ankh-Morpork Guard]

While I love the Rogue/Sorcerer concept...since you mentioned HP, definatly stick with Rogue.

 

[Isida Kep'Tukari]

Aye, go with the rogue. A rogue's got a number of good class abilities, and the skill points would be missed if you multiclassed out.

 

[Olive]

Well, the fighter might help you HP wise, but I'd say stick with rogue. Unless you're using an alt.Sorc. with a bigger HD. Even then, I'd still say stick with rogue.

 

[Halivar]

Hrmm... I just put up all my books and I'm too lazy to go pull them out...

How many levels of sorceror would it take to get to Arcane Trickster? It's a powerful class, especially if you (like we always did) take the original TaB class stat-block and ignore the text under "Sneak Attack."

 

[Ace]

We have a:
Pal1Cleric5 old guy
Pal5
Ftr6
Rogue6 (me)
We currently have no MU and with 26hp's I am still weak, so your thoughts?
Should I:
Take another lvl in Rog
Take a level in Ftr
Take a level in Sor
What do ya think?

Thanks

HMM I would skip taking a level as a Sorcerer poor HP and a couple of extra spells (that don't work in armor) aren't all that hot

I would either take more rogue (always good) a PRC (if you can find one that you can qualify for and you like) or either 1 level of fighter (which gets you on average 2 extra HP, +1 BAB extra feat and +2 to fort saves which is basically a free great fortitrude feat) or some Ranger levels.

Ranger gets good stealth and spotty skills just like a rogue so there is little loss) and with a couple you get a combat style, extra Fortitude and a few other cool things. Archery is always nice with a Rogue especially a low HP One who can't tank. Heck even 2wf is handy

If you like to twink and it fits a level of Barbarian works really well. Major HP and Fortitude and that sweet sweet movement bonus. Ojh Martial Weapons, Medium Armor and Rage aren't bad either

The problem with Multi Classes and why they often suck is lack of syngery (or synchronization if you prefer) Ranger and Rogue have as do Rogue and Fighter. Howver unless you start that way Spellcaster/Rogue combos do not.

Make classes work together if you multi class or the charcter will be weaker basically