I've read all your posts. They don't make any sense. You're trying to reason as if the OGL creates a statutory scheme for copyright pooling. But it doesn't. It's a private law agreement.I’ve answered these same questions 5000 times. It gets old. If you can’t actually respond to my posts with substance please stop asking me the same 5000 questions I’ve already answered.
You are trying to argue that a party can enter into a private law agreement, at time zero, with another entity that doesn't even exist at that time. But you can't point to any legal principle that explains how that would work.
You are trying to argue that licences can be created over IP that doesn't exist yet. You haven't explained how you think that works, by reference to any legal principles.
The above is my substantial response. You are not presenting any legal arguments. You are not engaging in any legal reasoning.