A flannel shirt
First Post
One thing I find annoying is the Direct Win Condition when you tied a game.
Let's see an exemple.
Player starts with cards P1 to P5.
CPU starts with cards C1 to C5.
After a tie, player 1 ends with P1, P2, C3, C4, C5
CPU ends with C1, C2, P3, P4, P5
During the rematch, the player is able to flip P3 and P4 while the CPU flip only C5.
Game result: Player win P3 and P4 cards while he lose C5.
After the rematch, player 1 ends with P1, P2, P3, P4, C3, C4
CPU ends with C1, C2, C5, P5
So, in the end, the player lose cards he hasn't even start with and gain cards the CPU didn't had... sounds like strange. I would have expected either:
In case of tie: Player would have won cards C3, C4, C5 and lost P3, P4, P5
OR
In case of tie, rematch, but at the end, Player would have lost P5 but would have won C3 and C4.
Because at the moment, you can lose cards you don't even have. Or worst, card you had only once and you didn't even bet in the challenge.
I think I know what you are talking about. Do you mean if you tie the first round, then win the match the 2nd and only get to keep the cards you "flipped" in the 2nd? The worst case scenario is you just won your own cards back.
I find that annoying as the cards I flipped in the first round I should be able to take at the end.