Re: Upper Krust...
Morning all!
Talath said:
Be careful Krust, if you speculate too much, you might get in trouble
Nothing I can't handle I'm sure!
jasamcarl said:
You know the combat mechanics of the Avatar true,
Thank you.
jasamcarl said:
but just as you can't judge the effectivness of Summon Monster by the simple stats of the creature summoned (duration, casting time, limitation on where/when etc)
I fail to see what the 'Summon Monster' analogy has to do with this!? Avatars have always been permanent beings in D&D and I see no logical reason why this is set to change!?
jasamcarl said:
you can't know how effective creating an Avatar is.
We know that WotC regard it as effective as one Salient Divine Ability.
jasamcarl said:
In the former case, the spell isn't as effective as simply having such an ally permenantly with no cost would indicate.
True. But then unless they impose some time limit on Avatar existence this example doesn't help us.
jasamcarl said:
This holds true for the Avatar ability: THE ABILITY IS MORE THAN JUST THE STATS OF THE AVATAR!!! Do you understand?
If you notice from Glyfairs post when describing Hera's Avatar WotC write:
"As Hera except..."
They then proceed to list the differences.
If you are implying that any character is more than just the sum of their parts then I agree. But that in no way displaces any part of my argument.
Although somewhere along the line I have lost what we were arguing about!?
We know certain facts, to which I have added some speculation and subsequently an opinion based on that speculation.
Are you arguing that I may be incorrect!? I agree.
Are you arguing I don't have the right to speculate about upcoming products!? If so, you are missing the point of the General Discussion board.
jasamcarl said:
And when did your self-described 'Speculation' and 'Educated Guesses' become FACTS which i have chosen to disregard?
I wasn't describing any speculation I was refering to the FACTS we have already unearthed.
I suggest you read them...weeping is optional.
- Automatic Actions (DC 10 + Divine Rank)
- Innate Spell Levels (Level 10 + Divine Rank)
- Domain Powers (Uses per day = Divine Rank)
- Divine Aura (DC = Divine Rank + 10 + Cha bonus)
- Salient Divine Abilities (Divine Rank +1, gaining one for Divine Rank +0)
- Divine bonus to AC
- Spell Resistance (32 +Divine Rank)
- Damage Reduction (35 + Divine Rank)
jasamcarl said:
Hermes can summon and infinite number of Avatars...yeah right....
I don't remember saying that. What I did say was that it looks as though the Avatar ability represents one Salient Divine Ability choice; of which Hermes has at least 16 (Divine Rank +1).
Presumably they wouldn't allow you to chose 'Avatar' at Divine Rank 0 or 1.
jasamcarl said:
Of course you can speculate and throw out what-if scenarios,
Thank you.
jasamcarl said:
but please be consistent with that without declaring that you have facts.
I have been consistent, you just haven't been paying attention mate!
jasamcarl said:
You might have been able to derive the quantifiable stats to which i say 'Bully for you!'
Thank you.
jasamcarl said:
but to make blind assertions as to the qualititave nature of Salient abilities which by definition rarely included in a stat block and then to chime in with 'BROKEN! BROKEN!'......kinda puts me off....
The 'qualititive nature of Salient Abilities' will have little effect on either my 'mechanical' or 'philosophical' argument.
Divine Rank may represent the equivalent of +1 (Epic) Level, or +2, or +3, or +4 etc. But it definately represents a '+'.
What I have said when delivering speculation is that 'based on the evidence at our disposal
if they are handling things like this then heres my opinion'...