Not to mention, he's actually are really nice guy.Not to mention two seasons of Good Omens (with a third one coming) and a second Netflix show coming next month with Dead Boy Detectives.
He also travels and do story readings and lectures about storytelling. These are things that sell out at the theatre venues.
Yeah, I had occasion to interact with him early in my career and he could not have been nicer.Not to mention, he's actually are really nice guy.
I wanted to do a short story of his in my English class - How to Talk to Girls at Parties (made into a movie with Nicole Kidman) - and I wanted to do it right. So, I emailed him, and straight up asked him if he minded if I printed a bunch of copies of his short story (it was on his website at the time) and used it and if he wanted me to sign some sort of boilerplate or anything like that (I had done that with some previous authors). He was really cool about it, told me to go for it and send pictures of the class. Which I did.
Very cool guy.
By hitting it with a staff.
And god knows I feel it whenever I hear someone describe something that is so far from superheroic that the light from superheroic would take ten thousand years to reach it as such.I have no idea who Tom Brady is. Never seen him (to my knowledge). I don't know anything about him.
If you're an American football fan, and you've just read the above (actually true) statement, then you now know how I feel (as a comic store owner) when someone says that they've never heard of Neil Gaiman.
It's Elvira isn't it?It's unfortunate the Necromancer is not going to be in the PHB, because I have a pretty clear picture of what a female Necromancer Wizard looks like.
ugh. Yes. So much. I am really tired of criticism of recent D&D editions as anything like superheroic.And god knows I feel it whenever I hear someone describe something that is so far from superheroic that the light from superheroic would take ten thousand years to reach it as such.
"They're slightly hard to kill and can do things reliably! Totally means they're superheroes and not basically competent."
Describing spectacles as “anachronistic” displays a level of historical ignorance. And ignorance tends to accompany - other views.Just stoking the flames, huh?
Yep, sure, seems ridiculous, so I guess I'll make fun about it... Not cool, really. And before you, or anyone else tries putting words in my posts (again), I never said anything about impaired vision being a "flaw".
Describing spectacles as “anachronistic” displays a level of historical ignorance. And ignorance tends to accompany - other views.