D&D General How am I a D&D outlier? How are you one?

[Lanefan]

I've played half elves and bards in every edition since 1E. They all were sub-par at the table.

I've never had a Bard get very far but I've had some thumpin' good Part-Elves in other classes.

 

[MGibster]

Hrm. I have to admit, I actually don't know if my players are white or not, having almost never seen their faces, but, I think most of them have been white. The ones I do know, have almost always been white. The last POC that I know was at my table would have been about 2000 or so.

I started gaming around 1988 and I didn't have a regular black player at my table until 2018 when I ran Curse of Strahd. A friend asked me to run CoS for his group and half the players were black, half were Latino, and 75% of them were gay. This was a combination that would have blown my mind back in 1991. (I think I played Cyberpunk 2020 for 2-3 years before I saw a photo of Mike Pondsmith and was surprised that he was black.) I think I saw more black gamers at my local game store a few years after Magic the Gathering become popular. I make no claims that there's a connection just when I can recall noticing it.

 

[haakon1]

How are you an outlier? How do you feel like one?

My unusualness:

1. Long campaign - me too. Always many year, but
2. I don’t play 5e except if someone else is running it. 3.5e for me.
3. I convert materials from other editions all the time. Running 1e module for one party, 3e stuff for another. I’ve converted from Basic, 1e, 2e, 3e, 5e, and PF1.
4. Restricted races - me too. Because I play Core rules.
5. I don’t encourage multiclassing and most of my players don’t do it.
6. Yup, I don’t have a predetermined plot either.
7. I don’t like high levels. I prefer low levels and I’m OK to about 10th. I get annoyed by high powered modules as they are usually Supers stories. There are a few good ones, though.
8. Balance. I care less than you do. I have a party with 2nd-10th level together. New players don’t come in at the same level as the party - they take over an NPC of their choice or build a character at a lower level if the player has the skill.
9. Encounter design is about what makes sense, not balance or skills or scene building for me too.
10. I’m a Greyhawk fanatic. I’m currently.
11. I use Excel for the minimat and Zoom, not tabletop program, for my “live“ campaign.
12. I use Excel and Word for my email campaign. I play on email.
13. Resource management - even weight and dropping your pack to go fast - is a core part of my game as well.
14. One of my players became a lord and is building his steading and detailing people and buildings.
15. Large parties. 7 players on Zoom campaign, 7 players in email campaign.
16. Slow prep. The game played on Zoom on Saturday, I’d been working on since July. (It’ll last us months.)
17. I don’t play 4 hours per week. Zoom game is more like 8 times a year. Email is all the time and hard to translate to equivalent butts-in-seat time.
18. I recruit new players. In Zoom, 6 of 7 players never played D&D before (the 7th was at GenCon’s in when it was at Parkside, pre Milwaukee, so complete expert). On email, 2 players have only ever been DM’d by me, and 3 more hadn’t played since 1e or 2e was in print.

 

[MGibster]

1. I don't think player races really matter all that much though I wish they did.
2. I roll out in the open where players can see.
3. I like alignment though I'm resigned to knowing my players aren't into it like I am.

 

[Lanefan]

It’s that old distinction between anecdotes & data.

Before one of my friends invited his GF to join us in the mid-80’s, I hadn’t even seen a female human being in a game store besides Moms buying stuff for their kids.

Since forever our player base has fairly consistently been about 1/3 female, with variance now and then of course. Relatively recently (i.e. the last three-ish years or so) that number has ticked up somewhat mostly due to one game being nearly all women and most of those being new to our crew.

 

[overgeeked]

1. My go-to edition is OD&D (by which I mean the white box, blue box, red box, and black box* editions; they're all coequal in my eyes and not different enough from each other for me to go about drawing pedantic distinctions).

* For the curious, I'm a Millennial who started gaming on black box OD&D and 2nd Edition AD&D.

Sorry to ask, but I am curious about this kinda thing. Which blue box and which black box are you talking about?

I ask because the original 1974 (and AFAIK only) white box was OD&D. But, as far as I know, both blue boxes and both black boxes were versions of Basic D&D. There are similarities between OD&D and Basic D&D, but they are different. The old red box is also Basic D&D.

Original blue Basic D&D box, though it's sometimes called white:

Revised blue Basic D&D (technically E of the BECMI line) box:

Original black Basic D&D (technically M of the BECMI line) box:

Revised black Basic D&D box:

 

[MNblockhead]

Depends on the campaign. My style varies based on the nature of the campaign I'm running.

In my current campaign, it is very adversarial style of DMing compared to what is considered acceptable in many circles. I'm running a deadly megadungeon and I play to "win", within the rule of the game and the setting. Players have all bought into this.

Also, I don't like short sessions. I would rather have fewer but longer sessions. My general schedule for my main campaign is 8 hours per session, once per month.

 

[Jack Daniel]

Sorry to ask, but I am curious about this kinda thing. Which blue box and which black box are you talking about?

You've got 'em on your list. The '77 Basic Set and the '91 D&D Game. At least in the area where I grew up (the Midwest around the Great Lakes), it was typical to distinguish all of those sets from Advanced D&D by referring to them as "Original D&D" (preceded by a box color if you needed to specify a certain version). As far as I can recall, this wasn't unusual on the internet back in the 90s either (see: the OD&Dities fanzine), though I'm sure there were straight-up flame-wars at the time on alt.rec.games.frp.dnd over the nomenclature. Curiously, the text of Mentzer Basic itself lends some support this tradition:

From what I understand, the modern practice of over-specifying the Original/Classic D&D versions (LBB, Holmes, B/X, BECMI, RC) originated on Usenet as well, but didn't gain any real traction until the Dragonsfoot forums in the early 2000s. (I also recall that Usenet posters tried to coin "BD&D," but it never caught on.)

 

[Dannyalcatraz]

Another way I’m an outlier is on the player side of the screen- I’ve played most of the basic races, classes and alignments. Especially most of the stereotypes/iconic combinations. And that incldues multiclassin.

So now, my tastes have become more esoteric.

This means, if you were trying to peg my FRPG character taste, the safest bet is to say my character will have a mix of some melee and some supernatural abilities, probably from multiclassing, but not necessarily.

For example, the last 3.5Ed PC I designed was a straight up, single classed fighter, but had magical abilities due to race, templates, and feats.

 

[Asisreo]

1. I play with XP. The only adjustments are that players get minor boosts during milestones, but their main source is through fighting.

2. I run dungeons in every adventure. They aren't always an underground prisons, but they use the dungeon crawling rules.

3. I use the rules for dungeon crawls.

4. I don't really "balance" anything. I create the adventure based on what makes sense in the world, not what would balance the game. If something can be arbitrarily decided, like how many zombies are in a graveyard, I either roll randomly or make it a reasonable number.

5. I do high-level adventures, and I enjoy them more than any other tier of adventure.

6. I hate playing Wizards, bards, and paladins.