Sorcerers don't get double benefit. They get to apply metamagic feats on the fly (which they can do anyway) and they pay the usual price for it. Per the FAQ, wizards also get to apply metamagic on the fly (which they can'tnormally do), but they don't pay anything for it. Thus, if anyone gets double benefit it is wizards (and other preparing casters).Imagicka said:So... why should sorcerers and bards get a double benefit, where the wizard and others only get the singular benefit?
Not per the OP, there isn't: "Note this isn't a discussion of the way it ought to be, just your opinion on what the RAW says (or implies as may be the case)."Patryn of Elvenshae said:There's really two questions here...
I don't agree because no matter what, prepared spellcasters get a double benefit. I don't relish the idea of prepared spellcasters that have some time to plan using a single rod to (e.g.) empower every single spell they own. That's a benefit, per RAW, that "spontaneous" casters will never get.glass said:Fortunately, IMO, the RAW is much more sensible.
Infiniti2000 said:Not per the OP, there isn't
On that, we agree.Patryn of Elvenshae said:I don't think everyone necessarily read that.
How do you translate 'three per day' into 'every spell they own'?Infiniti2000 said:I don't agree because no matter what, prepared spellcasters get a double benefit. I don't relish the idea of prepared spellcasters that have some time to plan using a single rod to (e.g.) empower every single spell they own. That's a benefit, per RAW, that "spontaneous" casters will never get.
Easy. Three yesterday, three today, three tomorrow, . . .glass said:How do you translate 'three per day' into 'every spell they own'?
All the rods described here are use-activated (but casting spells in a threatened area still draws an attack of opportunity).

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.