How is it done?

Here is another 'actual response'.

I do not like this feat, and I would not allow it in my campaign.

Because it does something that feats are not surposed to do, namely charge or improve your weapon type.

Feats should improve your fighting ability, not your weapon types.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Originally posted by hammymchamham

"are you illeterate?"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



"This is my favourite flame of the day.


Hong "beware the Illiterati" Ooi"
.
.
.
.
.
LOL

Thank you Hong, you just made my whole day.
 

But wait, hong... it gets better!

hammymchamham said:
...with the exception of a raiper...

The Raiper? Isn't that something that's best left to F.A.T.A.L.?

Rogue "Watch out for those Ra(i)pists" JK
:D ;)
 
Last edited:


*sigh* It's all gone downhill since Bugaboo left... :(

Too many people vying for the position Bugaboo vacated, most of whom fail miserably.
 

hammymchamham said:
are you illeterate? it says clearly on page 98-99 of the players hand book that swords, with the exception of a raiper, does slashing damage. go smoke a ham
:rolleyes: I'm not sure whether this was supposed to be ironic (i.e., misspelling "illiterate") or something, but either way, it was rude enough that people took exception to it. So please remember to voice your disagreement (or whatever) a bit less offensively in the future.
 


Ferret said:
Couldn't I enchant the bludgeoning part?:( :(

It's possible to come up with rationales for both the "yes" and "no" sides of the argument. However, since we're in the realm of house rules now, the only answer is "what your DM deems reasonable".

By the book, you couldn't even make a spiked chain bludgeoning in the first place. Just take what you've got and move on.
 


Remove ads

Top