That's undeniably true. My point was a narrow one--the integration of AI into search isn't a massive use of resources--because that was the question being asked. Video generation, training, development, enterprise integration, &c are another story.Comparing google ai queries to watching netflix is extremely misleading.
Generating a 2 hour ai movie will use more power than watching a movie, and then rewatching the ai slop will use the same power as watching the real movie.
And yall can throw around these comparisons all you want, doesnt change that the total power (and water) usage has shot up due to AI.
Then you cannot use anything but search results as a comparison point. And google ai search uses more power than just classic google search. which is the only thing it can fairly be compared to. Apples to apples.That's undeniably true. My point was a narrow one--the integration of AI into search isn't a massive use of resources--because that was the question being asked. Video generation, training, development, enterprise integration, &c are another story.
Doesn't make sense to me, but do that if you likeThen you cannot use anything but search results as a comparison point. And google ai search uses more power than just classic google search. which is the only thing it can fairly be compared to. Apples to apples
It is objectively the only way to attain any kind of useful comparison. Watching netflix uses more power than most online activities, but google ai search doesnt replace netflix in someones daily activities. It replaces normal google searching. What replaces netflix is ai video generation.Doesn't make sense to me, but do that if you like