Doug McCrae
Legend
No, it's an affectation.Jdvn1 said:Does it really bother you? Some of these people do naturally purr. It's a part of their personality.
No, it's an affectation.Jdvn1 said:Does it really bother you? Some of these people do naturally purr. It's a part of their personality.
You could argue that the majority of human behavior consists of affectations.Doug McCrae said:No, it's an affectation.
Well, that implies that the majority of human behaviour is puerile, annoying and pointless.Jdvn1 said:You could argue that the majority of human behavior consists of affectations.
Um, doesn't imply that at all.barsoomcore said:Well, that implies that the majority of human behaviour is puerile, annoying and pointless.
Which sounds about right to me.
So yep, affectation it is.
tarchon said:I've always figured they should just be a general class of monster, like Warhammer's "beastmen." Some kind of template.
Patryn of Elvenshae said:Hmmm ... Should I? I feel I must.
Well, the tip of my lightsaber is bent, too.
Felon said:There is one, in Savage Species. It boils down all the various animal-men into an anthropomorphic template. Of course, a lot of them don't turn out so well that way--e.g. horsemen have a -4 Str penalty.
Jdvn1 said:Some of these people do naturally purr. It's a part of their personality.
Posh, I naturally purr and always have. And I do not consider myself a 'furry'. Although I have affected fur, tail, and claws online on occasion, it was not out of some goofy sexual kink.d20Dwarf said:Yes, it is. Hands are not paws and people do not naturally purr. Those affectations are just as annoying as if someone went around talking in a Ren Faire accent and flourishing his arms all the time.
<poor British accent>Why yes, good sir! I *would* like to super-size my meal, ha HA!"</life>
:\
demiurge1138 said:Wait, wait... yak folk are drawn from and/or inspired by real world mythology? Because that is officially the next mythology on my list to explore.
Demiurge out.