WhatGravitas
Explorer
For the generic setting... I think it's the best they can do. Crib iconic stuff, re-imagine it, make it a "Best of D&D"-setting, which they're currently doing.Simplicity said:I think this is essentially what they are doing with the new setting. A less funky, out-of-the-box, no knowledge required, generic fantasy setting.
For FR and GH: A reboot would've been great. Really. But for FR, they'd invalidate hundreds of novels - and hence alienate a bunch of readers, who have probably never touched a RPG - I understand their fear, and why they have chosen this route.
For GH: Well, I hope they do a GH reboot as their 2010 setting book.
For Eberron: Never needed a reboot, since there is no metaplot.
Cheers, LT.
				
 But if it makes you feel better, it's not related. The Core Pantheon is NOT going to replace the Faerunian Pantheon. Yes, Bane is in it. So what? Tyr is also in the Asgardian Pantheon. Tiamat is in the Greyhawk Pantheon. Oghma and Silvanus are also part of other pantheons. So Bane wouldn't be the first god to hold a membership in more then one pantheon. It's not even a new thing for Bane, anyway. He's also worshipped in Ravenloft, where the only other Forgotten Realms god is Lathander.