TwoSix
Everyone's literal second-favorite poster
I totally get that, I'm pretty on the fence about paladins (and rangers and artificers). For rangers and artificers, I think enough of their power budget is baked into their spell options that it would be a major nerf to not have spells. Paladins, though, are strong enough that losing their spells would still make them pretty functional.It might be fine by the OP, but to me it doesn’t fit the premise. When we play no casters we exclude paladins.