• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Idiot behind the wheel

FickleGM said:
BTW - While I drive infinitely safer than I used to, speeding is still something that I find myself doing more than I should.
Speed is not, in and of itself, dangerous, but it does increase risk. As with any activity you have to judge the level of risk. In the UK on urban roads the speed limit of 30mph is generally about right for the limits of visibility you have, and any higher would have a big decrease in the survival chances of a child that runs out onto the road. I make a conscious effort to keep to this limit. However, last week I drove safely (and legally) at 130mph on a suitable straight road with no traffic around. That was fun! :cool:
 

log in or register to remove this ad

nerfherder said:
Speed is not, in and of itself, dangerous, but it does increase risk. As with any activity you have to judge the level of risk. In the UK on urban roads the speed limit of 30mph is generally about right for the limits of visibility you have, and any higher would have a big decrease in the survival chances of a child that runs out onto the road. I make a conscious effort to keep to this limit. However, last week I drove safely (and legally) at 130mph on a suitable straight road with no traffic around. That was fun! :cool:
Yeah, if your buddies weren't miles ahead there would have been traffic around. ;)
 

in the US they have posted limits for a reason. which are backed by tons of data from insurance companies due to accident reports. they also have posted warnings for curves and such with limits listed on those too. they are yellow signs.

everyone thinks they know how to handle themselves better than the posted limit.
 

FickleGM said:
Yeah, if your buddies weren't miles ahead there would have been traffic around. ;)
They were miles behind at that point of the journey :)

We were keeping over 10 second gaps between us for the high speed parts.
diaglo said:
in the US they have posted limits for a reason. which are backed by tons of data from insurance companies due to accident reports. they also have posted warnings for curves and such with limits listed on those too. they are yellow signs.

everyone thinks they know how to handle themselves better than the posted limit.
That's why I didn't exceed any posted limit.

Incidentally, I like the idea of yellow signs for curves. I remember them in Canada and they were a good guide. In the UK a corner sign can indicate anything from a gentle bend to a virtual 180 degrees switchback. Still, I would drive any corner based on my observation of it rather than a sign - you never know what's just around it...
 
Last edited:


nerfherder said:
They were miles behind at that point of the journey :)

We were keeping over 10 second gaps between us for the high speed parts.

That's why I didn't exceed any posted limit...

How nice of them. :D

P.S. - 10 seconds @ 130mph != miles
 



Infiniti2000 said:
….You're being as idiotic as the tailgaters in the first place. No, really!

:confused:

As Harmon points out, the only reason for you to slam on your breaks is for a big fat law suit. Is that what you're after? The point of this thread, I thought, was to discourage bad driving habits in order to save lives / reduce accidents, not encourage bad driving habits in order to kill people or collect a big paycheck at the expense of some insurance company -- which I would like to point out, not all people have. So, even Harmon's idea is flawed.

You make a good point here. My intent was to talk about bad driving, and a growing concern that I had, I was not intent on saying that you should slam on your breaks to discourage tailgating, I was trying to imply (as you gathered) that a law suit was the only real reason for that action; yes, break slamming a tailgater is flawed. Apologies if anyone misunderstood that.


Nerfherder makes a good point that a car is a weapon, in fact vehicle accidents kill more people then just about anything out there (Harmon- avoid getting political).


Aeolius said:
The SUV must not have been using a turn signal. I would not have let him merge either, unless he used a signal... I tend to be very LG, when driving; use your signals or you don't get in.

Here in California I use a turn signal only when I want someone to get out of my blind spot, or to signal them that ‘you need to pass me, cause I am about to move into your lane.’

It’s a thing I learned that if someone is within… oh, two hundred feet and they see a turn signal come on they will (no matter your speed difference) attempt to pass you when you turn on that signal. Cops I have found are the worst at this. Cops also seem to like my blind spot, but that is for another paragraph.

FickleGM- dude, I was so you about fifteen years ago (okay, so you said you had changed, but…). I once drove from Boise to Salinas (about 800 miles) in just under ten hours. Two gas stops, no food. I thought at one time that I saw a cop behind me, but he never caught up. It was incredibly stupid, esp. the drive down the Sierras and the insane moves I made, why? To get home in time to see my wife before she took off for a seminar. It was stupid.


Goddess FallenAngel said:
I'm not from Idaho unfortunatly, and didn't come up with anything on a Google search.

Did you trying calling the DMV and saying that you wanted to report an unsafe driver? http://www.dmv.org/id-idaho/department-motor-vehicles.php

I called California (they moved back here recently to sell their rental property- have to live here two years or pay a lot more on Capital Gains), they helped a bit, and one lady checked and told me that he did not have a license here in California. So I called Idaho and they were playing all nice until they heard something about California. No help. So I called back, got someone else (my intent), and I was told that there was nothing I could do from California (I never mentioned the state that time? Co Worker? Caller ID?). “I think he’s a hazard, he moved his driving foot by lifting his leg with his hand and placing it on a different peddle- you won’t help me save lives?” “You need to talk to him.” “He refuses to acknowledge that he has anymore of a disability- hello?” Ya, hung up on.

Thank you for the attempt, Angel, but I think I need to just get in a vehicle with him, and ask him to stop as soon as I say- “Stop!” and see what he does, if he flips out then I will have to explain to him that he’s a danger I can’t have around his grand daughter. With our present relationship, that should be the nail in the coffin for us. :(

Thanks all

ps- I have sent them an email, in hopes that I can find a non prejudice person in Idaho (that doesn't hate Californians).

Thanks
 
Last edited:

Harmon said:
... if someone is within… oh, two hundred feet and they see a turn signal come on they will (no matter your speed difference) attempt to pass you when you turn on that signal.

My family vehicle looks like this:
imagemed.asp

When I put on my signal, they better get out of my way. ;)
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top