As a writer of D20 products I'm aghast at this. First I know something of the publishing end of things and it is not at all cost prohibitive to send review copies to established reviewers. We at Living Imagination were thrilled when Eric Noah put us on his website. I can understand someone's ego getting in the way of taking comments that refer a potential customer to wait till it's on the discount rack with aplomb, but frankly the response to criticism's like that should be posting to forums like this one. Considering the cost of print advertising, websites like this one are the best way to get your product known. If I have a beef with a specific review I'll contest it (I think that's only happened with one review, and to be fair the reviewer even caveated that he did not like one aspect of the product as a general rule, not just restricting it to the product at hand). I find the reviews here and on Steve Creech's d20zines to be fair and unbiased. Steve even informs his audience when he receives a product for free, at least he did with Twin Crowns and Broadsides! , and I'm sure he will with Streets of Silver as well. If a publisher thinks they are being unfairly treated by a reviewer that's one thing, if however they want to complain because a reviewer is treating them fairly, and what they really want is for a reviewer to lie about their product... well, reviewers like that find that people stop paying attention after spending a few too many dollars on products that don't live up to their reviews.
Larry Fitzgerald
Author
Living Imagination
"Yes, I made up the word caveated, and there were several run on sentences in there, but used the word aplomb correctly so overall I give this posting a 3.5."