Interesting grammatical error in the DM guide

[Aperion]

On page 195:

"They doesn’t need to be
the same person."


Profound. I think the authors were trying to tell us something deeper here.

 

[Matt James]

My mind is blown. Epic find.

 

[jonesy]

Wow. They does not have to. But, they.. could have be?

 

[Zephrin the Lost]

So says all of us! or both of... wait.

--Z

 

[Aperion]

Obviously, they doesn't. But then again they have been know to doesn't for quite awhile now?

 

[Incenjucar]

Still not as good as the Demonomicon's "long back hair."

 

[Ferghis]

Well, only if you think RAW should trump RAI.