Nail said:Tell you what: you give me the opposing modifiers, and I'll calulate the chance of success! (I'll bet in this example, the chance is around 90%!)
Is this RAW, or just "his intention"? I don't have the CW in front of me....Hypersmurf said:It should also be noted that when (the author) wrote the class, he thought "and any applicable modifiers" meant "modifiers to BAB", rather than "modifiers to Sense Motive", so he assumed that the defender got to add Str bonus, Weapon Focus, etc etc.
...on my way.....Hypersmurf said:The opposing modifiers are detailed in the very first post of the thread
-Hyp.
Interestingly enough, the Invisible Blade here in Hyp's example is actually slightly better off rolling the dice rather than taking 10...her chance of success goes up by ~2%.Hypersmurf said:Ftr11 with no ranks in Sense Motive adds +11 to his opposed roll.
The Invisible Blade had a +15. She was Taking 10 on her Bluff checks, for 25.
The fighter needs a 14 or higher to beat the Bluff check, so the Invisible Blade will succeed 65% of the time.
Nail said:Is this RAW, or just "his intention"? I don't have the CW in front of me....
And no, this is just not that deadly. I'd be much more worried about a straight rogue with blink and a ghost touch weapon, or (heaven forfend) a properly-prepared straight spellcaster.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.