Iron DM 2012 -- R2 complete, Finals in Progress

Just a quick update: Nifft seems to have been called away on RL issues. If he hasn't responded by this time tomorrow, we'll have Wicht post a third judgement for this round, and move forward with gnome-wicht-phoamy as judges.

Sorry for the delays.

-rg
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Hi all. I've just spent an unscheduled week without internet. We lost power last Friday for 50 hours and when it came back on Sunday, we discovered we had also lost our cable connection. Which was not restored till today. I see that I need to make a judgment. I will try to get to it this afternoon, following lunch. At the moment, I am still wading through a week's worth of emails and other online business. Sorry about that. Its been something of a mess in my corner of the world and there are still people I know who do not expect power until next week.
 


My judgment follows:

[sblock]I'm going to try to be brief here and if I had more time I might be more critical. If there are specific questions, feel free to ask them. We have two good entries, and I think either could be worked into a fine adventure. As far as following rules, full marks for both.

Which brings us to Ingredient Use. Both use the Artist Studio as an essential part of the adventure, so 2 out of 2 points to both. I slightly prefer the Final Dragon of the Curious Case over the other, but I recognize that is purely subjective and 2 out of 2 points to both for Final Dragon. The Battered Manuscript of the Curious Case is also more innovative (kudos to Waylander for that) and I find that other than being mentioned that the manuscript is battered in Master Piece, the adjective has no real bearing on the manuscript itself. So 1 out of 2 for Master Piece and 2 out of 2 for Curious Case. Likewise for Suspended Clergyman, I find myself thinking again the Curious Case is more clever, though both get full points. With both Checks and Balances and Robe of Bones, I find that the uses are good, though not spectacular, but full points all around. I will mention that I think both Robes are far too powerful for actual in-game use, at least as described and at the power levels hinted at in the adventures. As an editor or lead-designer, I would insist on both being somehow made more manageable if they are potentially going to be won by the PCs as treasure.

Moving on to Useability, I think both are very useable, though Masterpiece has a weak hook and some conclusions of how things will unfold that might be wrong. Most PCs I know, if approached for a job by an obvious nut, will end up investigating him. Weak hooks are a no-no so I'm deducting a point for that.

Coming to Style, I think Curious Case is hands down the winner here. It is presented in a clear, concise manner and is easy to follow. Master Piece suffers a bit from a slight disjointing in the narrative. I think that if the set pieces and events were just broken down with some titles, it would be much better. I also dislike the railroading at the end, with the robe forcing a PC into a transformation (even if it is advantageous). All in all, I think Master Piece has a lot of potential, but it could use a more polish and presentation.

In the end I think The Curious Case of the Suspended Clergyman is the clear winner of this round. Congratulations to Waylander the Slayer!

Master Piece
Follow the Rules 6/6
Ingredient Use 11/12
Usability 5/6
Style 4/6
Total 26/30

Curious Case
Follow the Rules 6/6
Ingredient Use 12/12
Usability 6/6
Style 6/6
Total: 30/30[/sblock]
 

All right, gents, thank you for your patience. We have a Winner for Round 2, Match 2 - Waylander the Slayer.

So, we're ready to start checking availability for the Finals match between Waylander the slayer and Deuce Traveler.

Gentlemen: When would be good for you?
 


Sunday night works for me.

Thank you judges. I appreciate all your feedback.

RG, I have followed Iron DM for a long time, and some of my favorite entries are from the early days, including all of the current judges, Nemmerele, PC ( i recall an anthology of related adventures), Wulf Ratbane and Vaxalon (both a bit arrogant and effortless). The time limit does crimp things a bit, however, i was more commenting on my rushed effort than the 48 hour limit. I dont think more time necessarily helps. My better efforts were dpne in less than 4 hrs; this last effort was done in 2-3 hrs.

I also loved your criticsm on the dark vs. light; it definitely does follow, and would have been more elequent to have made the schism be based on the auditory than the visual.

Thank you Phoam and Wicht (great work on some of your Pathfinder stuff).

Bring it DT; your work and the semi final battle, to me, are the best entries for the entire contest so far.
 

Thanks Waylander! I was surprised on how you pulled out the stops on your last write-up. Those ingredients you had to deal with really threw me, especially the last dragon. Looking forward to this.
 


Remove ads

Top