IRON DM revival!

[Griswold]

Morning folks!

So I guess it's me and you Rune eh?

-G.

 

[Rune]

I meant it in a good way.


I have been greatly impressed by your story hours in the past and would like the challange of throwing my creative talents against yours.

In that case, thank you!

Plus you never did respond about Ral-Auth and I want to beat you down in revenge.

I'm...er, getting to it. I wanted to give it the detailed (dare I say, nemmerlesque?) analysis that it deserves and haven't had the opportunity to do so, yet. If you want the short version: It's on my list of games to run if I ever get paid to not work.. That is, if I ever have the time to do lots of extra campaigns.

 

[Rune]

Morning folks!

So I guess it's me and you Rune eh?

-G.

Looks like it. Good luck!



...but not too good, you understand...

 

[seasong]

Re: Re: Ladies and Gentleman!

I'll be happy to discuss/defend my submissions if I win, but don't expect me to do so when I lose; I didn't do it last time and I won't do it this time. I didn't want Nemm to get the impression that I didn't respect his judgement, whether or not I agreed with his assessment (although, truthfully, I had hoped some more of the allusions would have been noticed, but that was my own side-meta-game) and I won't defend my losing entries (if any, ) in this one for the same reason.

I think picking apart a losing entry, and getting the author's opinion on the matter, is at least half the fun. The comments I made on my own entry (dropping Irene, etc.) are pretty much identical to what I would have said if it lost:

"So, I guess in summary, I coulda done better."

 

[Tuerny]

Cool.
I look forward to it.

I have been meaning to revise it again for awhile, and once I get your analysis I will probably sit down and do it.

 

[Rune]

Re: Re: Re: Ladies and Gentleman!

I think picking apart a losing entry, and getting the author's opinion on the matter, is at least half the fun. The comments I made on my own entry (dropping Irene, etc.) are pretty much identical to what I would have said if it lost:

"So, I guess in summary, I coulda done better."

Perhaps I should clarify. If I had said anything about Nemm's judgement of my final entry, it would have been defensive, and that, I didn't need to do.

I suspect it'll be the same in this one.

 

[Rune]

Cool.
I look forward to it.

I have been meaning to revise it again for awhile, and once I get your analysis I will probably sit down and do it.

Well, if you're just waiting on my analysis to do it, go on. I have a lot on my table, right now. It's slow-going.

 

[incognito]

final pair Rune/Griswold

well he-LLO nurse!

OK guys, your set of ingredients:

Fine sand
Shadow Dragon
A dead God
Unusual coins
Githzerai Monk
Maintaining balance

the time is now 11:45 EST, you have 24 hours as well, and I will have a lot of reading and writing to do tomorrow!

Good luck R, and G!

edited for Dragon, rather than dagon

 

[Tuerny]

I actually have lots of stuff to do as well.
I was just saying that whenever you get around to it, it would serve as a good encouragement for me to actually get down and do the revision.

 

[Griswold]

Re: final pair Rune/Griswold

well he-LLO nurse!

OK guys, your set of ingredients:

Fine sand
Shadow Dagon
A dead God
Unusual coins
Githzerai Monk
Maintaining balance

the time is now 11:45 EST, you have 24 hours as well, and I will have a lot of reading and writing to do tomorrow!

Good luck R, and G!

is that Shadow Dagon supposed to be a Dragon?