Janx said:I think Mike missed the point (or a point) the original question was based on.
SNIP
I'm speaking from a single game perspective, and not acknowledging the fact that in the long term, the Druid would be hosed, due to not getting bigger magic items to beef him up.
I think people are interested in simple cross-over capability, for a one-shot say. You'd want to keep D&D magic items out of the hands of the IL PCs, and such.
It's kind of a litmus test on how compatible IL is with D&D.
Thanks,
Janx
Ozmar said:Why the title? Can you share any of the thoughts behind that choice?
(Unless, of course, you plan to make this the subject of a future design diary.)
TerraDave said:He may have missed the point again...from what he has written, it seems like if you had an IL charecter with IL wealth, and a 3.5 charecter with 3.5 wealth--they would be comporable, and you should be able to mix them, maybe he will chime in again on this.
mearls said:I am *terrible* with titles. The original title sounded too much like a setting (which, remember, the book doesn't really emphasize). I tried coming up with others, but largely failed. Someone suggested we put Iron in the title, and the title just sort of tumbled out from there.
Really, the choice came down to "We need a title. Make one up. NOW." Like I said, I'm terrible with titles. I didn't want it to be cutesy or weird, and Iron Lore seemed simple and easy enough to remember.
mearls said:Oh, OK. Sorry about being dense. Yes, if you used a straight PHB druid (with his magic items) with a straight IL character (without magic items), they should mix fine.
mearls said:Really, the choice came down to "We need a title. Make one up. NOW." Like I said, I'm terrible with titles. I didn't want it to be cutesy or weird, and Iron Lore seemed simple and easy enough to remember.