Fifth Element
Legend
Perhaps we need to clarify that imaginary/plastic S.O.'s don't count?drothgery said:Defying gamer stereortypes, "No. I have no S.O. " is not the most popular option.
Perhaps we need to clarify that imaginary/plastic S.O.'s don't count?drothgery said:Defying gamer stereortypes, "No. I have no S.O. " is not the most popular option.
Fifth Element said:Perhaps we need to clarify that imaginary/plastic S.O.'s don't count?
Ghostwind said:The poll assumes that you have a S.O. that even approves of gaming. Gotta clear that hurdle first, Spanky.
Same here. I chose "they don't care" but the real answer is "they're upgrading to 4e with me!"pawsplay said:My SO plays so I'm not sure how to interpret those poll options.
In all seriousness I agree with you. My wife plays D&D. Of the people I currently game with, about 60% do have serious S.O.'s.dmccoy1693 said:IMO, it makes sense that gamers have SOs. Comparing the average gamer to the average american, gamers are:
1) better educated (a fundamental part of our hobby involves reading and using our imagination, two things average americans don't do anymore) which translates into having more money,
2) able to hold down a job better (if we can meet for a weekly game, we should be able to get to work regularly, plus we know we need our fix and we need to fund it),
3) able to make long term relationships (how long do gaming groups/campaigns last?),
4) able to adapt to new problems/situations (we have a sadistic person that loves to see us squirm that we wilingly visit on a regular basis and we try to outsmart him/her) (EDIT: and we call this fun),
5) care about what we care about, regardless if its cool or not. We don't care if RPGs are the "in" thing to do or not. We're still playing.