Oofta
Legend
You just added weight to my claim that 5e is built saying that certain playstyles are badwrongfun. Adding to that is the fact that players tend to outnumber gm's by a significant degree with most tables having around 4-6 players (give or take) per 1 gm. any survey is going to be largely people who mostly or only play and as a result will not consider things from a gm's perspective of why a wraith or something should blast through 30+ ac like wet tissue paper instead of harmlessly bouncing off like every other melee ranged & spell attack.
Simply saying add them back in ignores the fact that we aren't having this discussion because there was a second or variant version of things like the wraith, ghast/ghoul, trog, rustmonster, various scary oozes, etc that lose their scary bits or have their scary bit nullified if they are up against someone with a magic weapon/armor. We are having this discussion because not only were they replaced with defanged declawed versions but even dmg 280/281 also completely omits those kinds of scary effects. simply putting them back in fights against too many changes in the system & you quickly run into a snowballing slippery slope where you have so many house rules upon house rules that you are playing a different game.
So you want a game that will support your personal preferences instead of the feedback they got from one of the most comprehensive play tests ever done for a TTRPG. Because you know better than the thousands of people that responded to their surveys.
Good luck with that. Personally I'd like a pony that leaves behind gold bars as droppings.
No game is perfect. Personally I only need a handful of house rules to make the game my own and I'd be perfectly happy to play the game without a single house rule.