Is "A Wizard Did It" Acceptable Worldbuiling?

[Eltab]

Obviously, it was Elminster in the library with a wrench. Sheesh.

Mordenkainen in the Study with a Merchant's Scale.
(that does not balance...any more)

 

[Bohandas]

I never understood why a wizard would protect his laboratory with a puzzle door. Answering the puzzle gives anyone access...and you already know the answer. Why?
If I was designing a trap for my laboratory, the solution to the puzzle door would trigger the trap. The actual answer would be something completely random. A puzzle dungeon with the wrong answers to every puzzle. A wizard did it.

Something like this scenario actually appears in the 3.5e adventure Expedition to the Ruins of Greyhawk. There's a puzzle room where the answer is unrelated to the question

 

[aramis erak]

WHile I find "A Wizard did it" a bit trite, it's fine.

As for dungeons making no sense to exist, period? Bah! Real world underground cities existed. Portions of modern cities are underground, including businesses in a few. (London, Portland, Montreal) One Australian city is almost entirely built below ground. Ethiopians and Libyans have dug down into the ground to build cool and shaded housing for millenia. And the (now gone) "Walled City" of Kowloon; an urban hive that was very dungeon like. And similar slums in other places.

And the ancient cities in Cappadocia, including Derinkuyu, Kaymaklı, Özkonak, Mazıköy and at least 32 others.... all underground.

And let's not forget... many human species seem to have liked caves. Even if only one remains today. (I honestly hope some of another species or two are hiding in the remaining jungles.)

Top 9 secret underground cities in the world - momomdo Discover

From deep salt mines to complex tunnels used for illicit activities, check out our top 9 picks of secret underground cities around the world

www.momondo.com

Pendleton Underground Is An Abandoned Underground City Hiding In Oregon

Have you heard about the abandoned underground city in Oregon? If not, you must visit Pendleton Underground. It has a fascinating history!

www.onlyinyourstate.com

UNDERGROUND TOUR - History of Seattle's Underground

Learn about how Bill Speidel, founder of the Underground Tour, discovered the Seattle Underground and the history behind it.

www.undergroundtour.com

Kowloon Walled City: A rare insight into one of the most densely populated places on earth which housed 50,000 people

Taken by Canadian photographer Greg Girard in collaboration with Ian Lamboth the pair spent five years familiarising themselves with the notorious Chinese city before it was demolished in 1992.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Fauchard1520]

WHile I find "A Wizard did it" a bit trite, it's fine.

As for dungeons making no sense to exist, period? Bah! Real world underground cities existed.

I'm not saying that it's unreasonable to have underground locations with believable backstories. I'm asking whether that's necessary for the game.

Take the mirror chamber in Conan the Destroyer:


If the party stumbles across that thing in an abandoned ruin, do you the GM need to know who built it and why? That's what I'm talking about here. Not whether dungeons in general can have backstories, but whether it adds anything to the experience at the table.

 

[aramis erak]

I'm not saying that it's unreasonable to have underground locations with believable backstories. I'm asking whether that's necessary for the game.

Take the mirror chamber in Conan the Destroyer:

If the party stumbles across that thing in an abandoned ruin, do you the GM need to know who built it and why? That's what I'm talking about here. Not whether dungeons in general can have backstories, but whether it adds anything to the experience at the table.

Having the backstory always influences how one presents it, even if the players don't get the backstory.

In the mirror chamber, the question arises as to whether the mirrors existed before the spell. Are they material components? Are they Summoned? Are they Illusory? (and, in various games, the answer mechanically might vary.)
If I go in knowing they're material components of an invulnerability spell, then Conan's going to be dealing with the slippery and dangerous glass.
If I go in knowing they're summoned, then when the critter is defeated, they probably vanish, along with their shards. So Slick and dangerous, but only while in the AoE.
If they are illusory, a manifestation of the spell of invulnerability cast upon the monster, but not real objects, then they probably don't present any threat to Conan at any point, but the monster protected clearly does.
If they and the monster are illusions, Conan failed his save. But the moment the monster's defeated, or he's out of the AoE, only his own psychosomatic injuries remain.
It all subtly alters how I run it.

If I were to run it as seen on screen, I'd lean towards the mirrors being a material component. Unless my group is expecting that.